Rated Care Homes

Windward House

  • Care home
  • 42 beds
  • No nursing
  • Dementia care
  • Registered since 2011
  • Devon, South West
G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2016, most recently Good in February 2026.

  • 8 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 232 of 283

    rated care homes in Devon are rated Good, like this one.

Windward House: inspection record

Care home, 42 beds, Devon

Rated Good in February 2026.

Windward House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Willow House Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. RI
    Hapstead Village Requires improvement, 4.4 miles away
  3. G
    The Rock Care Home Good, 4.6 miles away
  4. G
    Beaconville Nursing Home Good, 4.6 miles away
  5. G
    Redmount Residential Care Home Good, 4.6 miles away

See all care homes in Devon

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 19 February 2026 (assessment visit 6 November 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 18 November to 26 November 2025. We visited Windward House on 18 November and 24 November 2025. The service was supporting 23 people at the time of our assessment, of a possible 42 places provided by the service. The service is a residential service providing support to older people some of whom are living with dementia.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We assessed 21 Quality Statements under 3 Key Questions of: Safe, Effective, and Well Led. Our overall rating for this service is Good.

The provider was previously in breach of 5 legal regulations in relation to safeguarding, safe and effective staffing, safe care and treatment, consent, and good governance. Improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations.

People were protected and kept safe. The service risk assessed people’s needs and acted when needed. Staff reviewed assessments taking account of people’s communication, personal and health needs.

This assessment found there were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience to meet people’s needs. Managers made sure staff received training and regular supervision and appraisals to maintain high-quality care. Staff managed medicines well.

People had enough to eat and drink to stay healthy and people were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity and the confidentiality of their information. Staff treated people as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care. People were able to take part in activities and engagement which ensured everyone had enough stimulating activity in their lives.

The service worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving between services. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment. Leaders in the home were aware they needed to further develop aspects of dementia care to fully meet peoples’ needs.

The provider was overseeing the governance and improvement of the service. The service leadership team and the provider supported staff wellbeing and there was a shared vision and culture in the service. Managers worked with the local community to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

    The service was previously in breach of legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, safe staffing, and safeguarding. The new management of the service had ensured the service was now being delivered safely, and these regulations were now complied with.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

    The service was previously in breach of legal regulations in relation to consent. The new management of the service had ensured the service was now being delivered effectively and this regulation was now complied with.

  3. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was previously in breach of legal regulations in relation to management and governance of the service. The new management of the service had ensured the service was now being well led and this regulation was now complied with.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 30 August 2019. Latest assessment published 19 February 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04142598 (opens Companies House)

Thurlestone Court Limited runs 3 services, all in the South West. 3 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Thurlestone Court Limited

  1. G
    Beacon House Good. Care home, Devon
  2. G
    Willow House Good. Care home, Devon

Getting help from Devon County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Windward House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Windward House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Windward House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 42 beds at Windward House.
When was Windward House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Windward House was published on 19 February 2026.
Who runs Windward House?
Windward House is run by Thurlestone Court Limited. It runs 3 services, all in the South West.
What is Windward House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 19 February 2026.

Contact

Phone
0136472386
Address
Totnes Road, South Brent, TQ10 9JN Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Willow House Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. RI
    Hapstead Village Requires improvement, 4.4 miles away
  3. G
    The Rock Care Home Good, 4.6 miles away
  4. G
    Beaconville Nursing Home Good, 4.6 miles away
  5. G
    Redmount Residential Care Home Good, 4.6 miles away

See all care homes in Devon