Palm Court Nursing Home
- Care home
- 53 beds
- Nursing care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2011
- Eastbourne, East Sussex, South East
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
13 ratings
Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Requires improvement.
9 months
since the latest rating was published.
39 of 258
rated care homes in East Sussex are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Palm Court Nursing Home: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in January 2026, up from Inadequate.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Lebrun House (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Ranworth House (Outstanding, 0.1 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- RI Prideaux House Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Lebrun House Good, 0.1 miles away
- O Ranworth House Outstanding, 0.1 miles away
- G Rivendale Lodge EMI Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
- G St Marguerite Good, 0.2 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 20 January 2026 (assessment visit 18 November 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment, 15 December to 29 December 2025.
Palm Court Nursing Home is a residential care home providing personal and nursing care for up to 53 people. The service provides support to older people and people living with dementia. At the time of our inspection there were 30 people using the service.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive No rating
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
This inspection was carried out to follow up on the warning notices served for safe care and treatment, and good governance, and the previous breaches of regulations relating to; safe care and treatment, person centred care, staffing and good governance.
At this inspection we found sufficient improvements had been made and the provider had met the warning notices and the breaches of regulation. However, whilst the breaches of regulation have been met, there needs to be continuous monitoring and embedding to ensure the improvements are sustained.
The provider and manager had re-introduced quality assurance systems to ensure any improvements required, were identified, monitored and actioned. Person centred care for peoples’ health and physical needs was improved, and contained detailed information for staff to follow, but there were gaps in peoples’ oral health and personal care support plans regarding choice. Improvements were also needed to ensure peoples’ mental health and social needs were highlighted, monitored and steps taken to promote social well-being and mental stimulation. Daily notes were task focussed and contained minimal reflection of their emotional and social needs.
We received an update during the assessment process, which included any areas brought to the managers attention. However we did find some shortfalls that were fully discussed. For example, improvements were needed to support communication and for those people who lived with dementia, such as dementia aids and dementia friendly signage.
Staff felt the management team were open and approachable, and there were regular opportunities for staff and management to discuss incidents or areas for improvement within the service to ensure lessons were learnt. People and staff told us they would feel confident to raise any concerns and that these would be responded to by the management team. The provider had liaised with external health professionals to provide joined up care and treatment for people. This had promoted safe transitions for people moving between different services. People received safe care from a sufficient number of suitably trained staff. Staff managed risks safely, responsively and effectively. The home was clean and provided a comfortable and safe environment.
People were supported by staff to follow a healthy lifestyle. Staff treated people with kindness and compassion, and there was a positive and friendly culture in the service.
This service has been in Special Measures since June 2025. The provider demonstrated improvements that have been made. The service is no longer rated as inadequate overall or in any of the key questions. Therefore, this service is no longer in Special Measures.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question Inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
There was evidence to support that the breaches in relation to safe care and treatment and staffing we found at the previous inspection, had been met.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
There was evidence to support that the breach of regulation in relation to person centred care we found at the previous inspection had been met.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
No rating
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Requires Improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained Requires Improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question Inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to Requires Improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.
There was evidence to support that the breach of regulation in relation to governance we found at the previous inspection had been met. However, improvements still needed time to become fully incorporated into day to day processes.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 20 January 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 20 January 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
- Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
Registration details
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Physical Disability
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)17 inspection reports, latest 12 August 2023. Latest assessment published 20 January 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- DFB (Care) Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 04918583 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from East Sussex County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at East Sussex County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0345 60 80 191, 8am to 8pm, 7 days a week (including bank holidays)
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: East Sussex County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Palm Court Nursing Home provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Palm Court Nursing Home as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does Palm Court Nursing Home have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 53 beds at Palm Court Nursing Home.
- When was Palm Court Nursing Home last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Palm Court Nursing Home was published on 20 January 2026.
- Who runs Palm Court Nursing Home?
- Palm Court Nursing Home is run by DFB (Care) Limited.
- What is Palm Court Nursing Home's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 20 January 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01323 721911
- Address
- 17 Prideaux Road, Eastbourne, BN21 2ND Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Lebrun House (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Ranworth House (Outstanding, 0.1 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- RI Prideaux House Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Lebrun House Good, 0.1 miles away
- O Ranworth House Outstanding, 0.1 miles away
- G Rivendale Lodge EMI Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
- G St Marguerite Good, 0.2 miles away