Rated Care Homes

Merlin Court Care Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 133 of 151

    rated care homes in Wiltshire are rated Good, like this one.

Merlin Court Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 62 beds, Wiltshire

Rated Good in July 2026, up from Requires improvement.

Merlin Court Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Merlin's Barrow Good, 0.7 miles away
  2. G
    OSJCT Coombe End Court Good, 0.7 miles away
  3. G
    Forestview Good, 0.8 miles away
  4. G
    Savernake View Care Home Good, 0.9 miles away
  5. RI
    Marlborough Lodge Requires improvement, 1 mile away

See all care homes in Wiltshire

See all care homes in Marlborough

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 28 July 2026 (assessment visit 13 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 26 to 30 June 2026. Merlin Court Care Home provides accommodation with personal care for up to 62 people. It provides care to adults of all ages, people with physical disabilities, sensory impairment and dementia. At the time of this assessment there were 57 people using this service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

People’s needs were assessed which helped staff produce personalised care plans. These provided staff with details on how to provide person-centred care and support. If people needed additional monitoring this was completed and staff liaised regularly with healthcare professionals. Staff communicated with each other about people’s needs and had timely updates when things changed. Staff understood the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the importance of obtaining consent.

Risks to people’s safety had been identified and assessed but we found some conflicting information in people’s risk management plans. However, we also found detailed information for staff to follow if people experienced distress. People had personal emergency evacuation plans which recorded what support they needed in the event of an emergency.

The service was clean and well maintained. Regular health and safety checks were being completed, and equipment was serviced by external contractors. Staff followed good infection prevention and control procedures and used personal protective equipment safely.

Staff were recruited safely and there were enough staff to meet people’s needs. There was a clear line management structure which staff understood. New staff had an induction when starting work and ongoing training and support. The provider had systems to support staff wellbeing and promote equality, diversity and inclusion amongst the workforce. Staff told us they felt well supported and enjoyed their work.

Medicines were safely managed. Staff had training and checks of their competence to safely administer medicines. Regular medicines audits were being completed.

There was a registered manager in post. Governance systems were effective and identified areas for improvement. All actions from quality checks were added to the provider electronic system for monitoring. This ensured all actions were addressed in a timely way.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Leslie Johnson
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

5 inspection reports, latest 7 April 2021. Latest assessment published 28 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Avery Homes (Nelson) LimitedBrand: Avery
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
06655187 (opens Companies House)

Avery Homes (Nelson) Limited runs 17 services in England, 1 of them in the South West. 14 are rated Good or Outstanding and 3 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Avery Homes (Nelson) Limited

  1. G
    Adelaide Care Home Good. Care home with nursing, Bexley, London
  2. G
    Albion Court Care Centre Good. Care home with nursing, Birmingham, West Midlands
  3. G
    Amarna House Care Home Good. Care home, York, Yorkshire and the Humber
  4. G
    Avalon Court Care Centre Good. Care home with nursing, Coventry, West Midlands

See all 17 services run by Avery Homes (Nelson) Limited

Getting help from Wiltshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Merlin Court Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Merlin Court Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Merlin Court Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 62 beds at Merlin Court Care Home.
When was Merlin Court Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Merlin Court Care Home was published on 28 July 2026.
Who runs Merlin Court Care Home?
Merlin Court Care Home is run by Avery Homes (Nelson) Limited. It runs 17 services in England, 1 of them in the South West.
What is Merlin Court Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 28 July 2026.