Mountview
Care home, Bexley, 8 beds
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
Mountview: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in November 2025, down from Good.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Inspected and rated 3 times since 2016. Rated Good in 2016 and 2018, then Requires improvement in November 2025.
Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement. The latest rating was published 11 months ago.
How it compares locally
- One of 6 Requires improvement care homes in Bexley, out of 26 with a rating.
- Smaller than 9 in 10 care homes in Bexley.
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 27 November 2025 (assessment visit 24 September 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: 1 October 2025.
Mountview is an 8 bedded care home supporting adults with a learning disability or autistic people. At the time of our assessment 8 people were using the service.
Read the full summary
The last rating at the service was Good (published 10 January 2018). The rating has changed to Requires Improvement.
We undertook this assessment due to the time since our last assessment. We looked at 8 quality statements. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgments about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.
At this assessment we found the provider was in breach of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated activities) Regulations 2014 in relation to regulation 10 (Dignity and respect), regulation 15 (Premises and equipment) and regulation 11 (Need for consent). We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.
People were not treated with dignity and respect due to the provider running another business at the care home on the first floor,without ensuring a separation of the two businesses.This resulted in employees from the other business having regular access through people’s home to get to their place of work, and through people’s back garden to access a training room situated in their back garden.The provider had failed to assess, plan for or mitigate these risks to people living at Mountview of another business operating there. The provider was not working within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 to assess if people had mental capacity to decide about consent to the shared environment with the other business, and to ensure best interest decision making was followed where they lacked capacity to decide
There were systems and processes in place to manage and follow up on accidents and incidents. Staff understood and adhered to their responsibilities to safeguard vulnerable adults. Staff understood and managed risks to people’s safety.
Staff liaised with other health and social care professionals and those important to people to ensure decisions were made in people’s best interests where they did not have capacityregardingtheir care and support needs.
There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. The provider made sure staff received training and regular supervision to maintain high-quality care.Staff involved people intheir care provisionand supported them to make choices about aspects of daily life,andpeoplewere encouraged tomaintainrelationships with their relatives.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to Regulation 15 (Premises and equipment).
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to Regulation 11 (Need for consent).
-
Caring
No rating
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to Regulation 10 (Dignity and respect).
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 27 November 2025. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Caring was rated Requires improvement on 27 November 2025. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
Contact and registration details
| Address | 118 Upton Road, Bexleyheath, DA6 8LX |
|---|---|
| Phone | 020 4619 0696 |
| Registered manager | Laura Jayne Patterson |
| Registered with the CQC since | |
| What it provides |
|
| Who it supports |
|
| Inspection reports | 5 inspection reports, latest 10 January 2018 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) Latest assessment published 27 November 2025; CQC's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports. |
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
| Provider | Bexley Independent Living Services Limited |
|---|---|
| Ownership type | Organisation |
| Companies House number | 07282145 (opens Companies House) |
Nearest alternatives
- G Adelaide Care Home Care home with nursing, 0.6 miles awayGood
- – Maples Care Home Care home with nursing, 0.8 miles awayNot yet rated
- G Parkview Care home, 0.8 miles awayGood
- O Groveland Park Care Home Care home, 1.2 miles awayOutstanding
- G Loring Hall Limited Care home, 1.3 miles awayGood
Getting help from London Borough of Bexley
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at London Borough of Bexley
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 020 8303 7777, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: London Borough of Bexley
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Mountview provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Mountview as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Mountview have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 8 beds at Mountview.
- When was Mountview last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Mountview was published on 27 November 2025.
- Who runs Mountview?
- Mountview is run by Bexley Independent Living Services Limited.
- What is Mountview's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 27 November 2025.