Rated Care Homes

Shenstone Court Care Home

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 2 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 21 of 82

    rated care homes in Dudley are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Shenstone Court Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 64 beds, Dudley

Rated Requires improvement in August 2026.

Shenstone Court Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Inshore Support Limited - 10 Melbourne Road (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Gower Gardens Residential Care Home (Good, 0.9 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
  2. G
  3. G
    60 Olive Lane Good, 1 mile away
  4. RI
    Grange Hill House Residential Home Requires improvement, 1 mile away
  5. G
    Butterfly House Good, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Dudley

See all care homes in Halesowen

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 6 August 2026 (assessment visit 24 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 06 July 2026 to 14 July 2026.

The home provides accommodation and personal care for up to 64 older people, including people living with dementia. At the time of the inspection, 53 were using the service.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

During our assessment, we identified concerns regarding medicines management and governance oversight. We found examples of delays in obtaining prescribed medicines, medicines recording and storage issues, stock control discrepancies and inconsistencies within some medicines-related records. Although the provider had systems in place to monitor quality and safety, these had not always identified or prevented the concerns found during our assessment. Some feedback also highlighted occasional delays in responding to people at busy times and inconsistencies relating to hydration oversight and mealtime support.

However, we found many positive aspects of care and support. People, relatives and professionals told us staff knew people well, recognised changes in their health and generally responded appropriately to their needs. Staff interactions were consistently caring, respectful and person-centred, and people were supported to maintain their interests, relationships and independence.

People were supported by staff who understood their preferences and routines, and care records demonstrated individualised approaches to managing risks, decision-making and healthcare needs. The home worked closely with a range of health and social care professionals, and feedback confirmed staff generally recognised deterioration, made appropriate referrals and communicated concerns in a timely way. We observed a welcoming environment where people were engaged in meaningful activities and supported to access community opportunities and healthcare services.

Leaders were visible, approachable and responsive throughout the assessment. The registered manager had taken some action to investigate concerns, strengthen medicines oversight and introduce additional monitoring processes. Staff spoke positively about leadership and felt able to raise concerns. Overall, we found a caring and supportive culture where people’s wellbeing was promoted, but further improvements were needed to ensure medicines management and governance systems consistently identified, mitigated and responded to risks.

We found 2 breaches of regulation in relation to the ways people’s medicines were managed safely and governance at the service. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.

    The provider was in breach of legal regulation in relation to the ways people’s medicines were managed safely.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  4. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The provider was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 6 August 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 6 August 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Margaret Richards
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Country Court Care Homes 14 LimitedBrand: Country Court Care
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
13798488 (opens Companies House)

Country Court Care Homes 14 Limited runs 4 services in England, 1 of them in the West Midlands. 1 is rated Good or Outstanding, 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 2 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Country Court Care Homes 14 Limited

  1. G
    The Grange Good. Care home, Essex, East of England
  2. –
    Ruby Lodge Care Home Not yet rated. Care home, North Yorkshire, Yorkshire and the Humber
  3. –
    The Moat House Care Home Not yet rated. Care home, Essex, East of England

Getting help from Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Shenstone Court Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Shenstone Court Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Shenstone Court Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 64 beds at Shenstone Court Care Home.
When was Shenstone Court Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Shenstone Court Care Home was published on 6 August 2026.
Who runs Shenstone Court Care Home?
Shenstone Court Care Home is run by Country Court Care Homes 14 Limited. It runs 4 services in England, 1 of them in the West Midlands.
What is Shenstone Court Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 6 August 2026.

Contact

Address
1 Somers Road, Halesowen, B62 8EN Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Inshore Support Limited - 10 Melbourne Road (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Gower Gardens Residential Care Home (Good, 0.9 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
  2. G
  3. G
    60 Olive Lane Good, 1 mile away
  4. RI
    Grange Hill House Residential Home Requires improvement, 1 mile away
  5. G
    Butterfly House Good, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Dudley

See all care homes in Halesowen