Rated Care Homes

Holgate House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 6 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 25 of 32

    rated care homes in York are rated Good, like this one.

Holgate House: inspection record

Care home, 22 beds, York

Rated Good in July 2026, up from Requires improvement.

Holgate House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Lifestyles Good, 0.6 miles away
  2. G
    South Park Care Home Good, 1 mile away
  3. G
    Amarna House Care Home Good, 1.1 miles away
  4. –
    Pendale Lodge Not yet rated, 1.1 miles away
  5. G
    Chocolate Works Care Village Good, 1.2 miles away

See all care homes in York

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 6 July 2026 (assessment visit 17 March 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Assessment Date: 11 May to 12 June 2026.
Holgate House is a residential care service supporting adults with learning disabilities, mental health conditions and adults both over and under 65 years. People told us they felt safe living at the service and staff understood safeguarding processes and how to raise concerns. There was a consistent staff team who knew people well, and people received support in a timely way. The environment was safe but worn in places; leaders were aware of this and had plans in place to refurbish and improve the premises. Staff worked well with external professionals to support continuity of care, and infection prevention and control practices were followed appropriately.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service mostly demonstrated the principles of Right support, Right care and Right culture. People were supported to have choice and control over their lives, access the community and maintain relationships, which reflected a person-centred approach. Staff understood people’s needs well and promoted independence, dignity and respect. However, some systems, including care planning, risk assessment and monitoring of outcomes, required further development to ensure support was consistently personalised, evidence-based and clearly reflected what mattered to people. Improvements to documentation and oversight were in progress, but not yet fully embedded. The environment was also not in line with Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture as it was a large service with 18 people living there. While the provider plans to reduce the maximum occupancy to 22, this is still more than what would be in line with best practice to support people with a learning disability and autism.

Care was kind, respectful and person-centred, and people told us they were treated with dignity and as individuals. Staff promoted people’s independence, choice and control, and people were supported to access their communities and maintain relationships. However, the effectiveness of care required improvement. Care planning and risk assessments were not always detailed or consistent, and health-related planning and outcome monitoring needed further development to ensure care was consistently evidence-based and focused on what mattered to people. Leaders had recognised these shortfalls and had begun to make improvements, but these were not yet fully embedded. The service was well led overall, with a new manager who had made positive changes in a short period of time. People, staff and professionals reported improvements in leadership, culture and openness, and governance systems were being strengthened to support sustained improvement and a positive learning culture.

The provider was previously in breach of regulation 12 and 17 at the last inspection. Improvements were found at this assessment and the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 6 July 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Joanne Rowntree
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 2 June 2023. Latest assessment published 6 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Milewood Healthcare LtdBrand: Milewood
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04584055 (opens Companies House)

Milewood Healthcare Ltd runs 23 services in England, 7 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber. 15 are rated Good or Outstanding, 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 7 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Milewood Healthcare Ltd

  1. G
    Alexandra House Good. Care home, Stockton-on-Tees, North East
  2. G
    Ash Tree House Good. Care home, Redcar and Cleveland, North East
  3. G
    Beechwood House Good. Care home, Stockton-on-Tees, North East
  4. G
    Blenheim House Good. Care home, Redcar and Cleveland, North East

See all 23 services run by Milewood Healthcare Ltd

Getting help from City of York Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Holgate House provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Holgate House as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Holgate House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 22 beds at Holgate House.
When was Holgate House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Holgate House was published on 6 July 2026.
Who runs Holgate House?
Holgate House is run by Milewood Healthcare Ltd. It runs 23 services in England, 7 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber.
What is Holgate House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 6 July 2026.

Contact

Phone
01904 654638
Address
139 Holgate Road, York, YO24 4DF Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Lifestyles Good, 0.6 miles away
  2. G
    South Park Care Home Good, 1 mile away
  3. G
    Amarna House Care Home Good, 1.1 miles away
  4. –
    Pendale Lodge Not yet rated, 1.1 miles away
  5. G
    Chocolate Works Care Village Good, 1.2 miles away

See all care homes in York