Rated Care Homes

Bradbury Grange

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 7 ratings

    First rated Requires improvement in 2015, most recently Requires improvement in October 2022.

  • 4 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 89 of 445

    rated care homes in Kent are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Bradbury Grange: inspection record

Care home, 50 beds, Kent

Rated Requires improvement in October 2022.

Bradbury Grange: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Bluebells Care Home (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Harrier Lodge (Good, 0.7 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Bluebells Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Maylands Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  3. RI
    Whitstable Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    Harrier Lodge Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Whitstable House Good, 0.9 miles away

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Whitstable

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 8 October 2022. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Bradbury Grange is a residential care home providing personal care to older people and people living with dementia. At the time of the inspection, 47 people were living at the service. Accommodation is spread over two floors in a large detached property. On each floor there was a large communal lounge and dining room where people could choose to spend their time. The service can support up to 50 people.

What inspectors found

People, staff and relatives told us there were not enough staff deployed to ensure people received the care and support they needed when they needed it. There were days when there was not enough staff. Agency staff covered some shortfalls, but people told us that agency staff did not know them and how they liked to be cared for.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Staff said they were demoralised and felt unsupported and not listened to by the management team. At the time of the inspection there was no registered manager in post. The registered manager had recently left the service. The provider was trying to recruit a new manager. People told us that they were bored, there was nothing to do. People, relatives and staff said they had reported this to management, but little action had been taken. Staff were recruited safely. Safety checks had been completed before staff started working with people.

Some people had medical conditions. Staff had not received specialist training in these areas like diabetes, catheter and stoma care. Risks to people's health and wellbeing had been assessed and there was guidance in place on how to mitigate these risks. However, risk assessments gave little guidance on how to support people consistently and in a way that suited them best when they became upset and distressed.

Medicines were managed safely. Some people were supported to take their medicines independently and this was assessed and monitored. However, when people were prescribed 'as and when' medicines when they were distressed there was no guidance in place to make sure these medicines were given consistently and safely.

Safety checks and risks within the environment were checked and action taken if any shortfalls or concerns were identified. Fire exits were accessible for people in the event of an evacuation. The environment was clean and safe. There were procedures to protect people from the risk of infection. Some areas of the service were in need of redecorating and improvements to support people living with dementia.

People were protected from abuse and avoidable harm and were treated with respect and dignity. People were supported to have day to day choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests. Staff helped to maintain people's independence by encouraging them to do as much as possible for themselves.

People's needs were assessed and reviewed to ensure care being delivered was up to date and reflective of their needs. People had care plans that provided guidance for staff on the support and care that they needed on a daily basis. People received a healthy, balanced and nutritious diet that supported their health and wellbeing.

The service worked with healthcare professionals to ensure people's health needs were met. People and relatives said GP's and other specialists were contacted when needed. When health care professionals had raised concerns, these had been responded to and action taken. Visiting professionals told us they thought the service had improved over the past couple of years, but they were concerned this may not continue due to the registered manager leaving. When accidents or incidents occurred, learning was identified to reduce the risk of them happening again.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 8 October 2022. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 8 October 2022. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 8 October 2022. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  4. The last rating is 4 years old. Ask what has changed since then.

Registration details

Registered manager
Kim Saint
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

11 inspection reports, latest 8 October 2022. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Methodist HomesBrand: Methodist Homes
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04043124 (opens Companies House)
Charity number
1083995

Methodist Homes runs 93 services in England, 10 of them in the South East. 83 are rated Good or Outstanding and 10 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Methodist Homes

  1. O
    Briar Hill House Outstanding. Care home with nursing, Staffordshire, West Midlands
  2. O
    Horfield Lodge Outstanding. Care home with nursing, Bristol, South West
  3. O
    Mapplewell Manor Outstanding. Care home, Barnsley, Yorkshire and the Humber
  4. O
    Queens Court Outstanding. Care home, Cambridgeshire, East of England

See all 93 services run by Methodist Homes

Getting help from Kent County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Bradbury Grange provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Bradbury Grange as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Bradbury Grange have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 50 beds at Bradbury Grange.
When was Bradbury Grange last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Bradbury Grange was published on 8 October 2022.
Who runs Bradbury Grange?
Bradbury Grange is run by Methodist Homes. It runs 93 services in England, 10 of them in the South East.
What is Bradbury Grange's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 8 October 2022.

Contact

Phone
01227 273209
Address
74 Canterbury Road, Whitstable, CT5 4HE Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Bluebells Care Home (Good, 0.1 miles away) and Harrier Lodge (Good, 0.7 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Bluebells Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. RI
    Maylands Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  3. RI
    Whitstable Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    Harrier Lodge Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Whitstable House Good, 0.9 miles away

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Whitstable