The Waves
- Care home
- 3 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2011
- Canford Heath, Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole, South West
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
4 ratings
First rated Requires improvement in 2017, most recently Good in October 2026.
This month
The latest rating was published.
108 of 121
rated care homes in Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole are rated Good, like this one.
The Waves: inspection record
Rated Good in October 2026.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- O The Moorings Outstanding, 0.3 miles away
- G The Shores Good, 0.3 miles away
- G The Dunes Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Anchor House Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Alexandra House Good, 0.7 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 12 October 2026 (assessment visit 10 September 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
About the service
The Waves is a care home registered to provide care and support for up to 3 people. At the time of our inspection there was 1 person living in the home. There were no plans for anyone else to move in.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
Who the service is for
The is a specialist service for people with a learning disability and autistic people.
We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.
Key findings
We carried out this assessment on 21 to 22 September 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard.
The provider was responsive and introduced new systems to ensure they maintained effective oversight of the service and care delivered.
The provider had systems in place to ensure concerns could be raised quickly and appropriately.
Staff told us they knew how to raise concerns with the registered manager and felt people were safe living at the service. Staff told us they knew how to report concerns to external organisations, if necessary, such as the local authority safeguarding team or CQC.
Risks to people’s safety and wellbeing were assessed. Staff confirmed they knew people well and were given enough information on their needs and risks. A staff member told us, “I am given enough information about people I support, for example read support plans and risk assessments.”
Staff told us they knew how to report maintenance concerns when necessary. People had up-to-date Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans in place.
Training records confirmed staff completed training to ensure they had the, skills and knowledge to carry out their roles. A staff member told us, “I definitely have enough appropriate training to fulfil my role here. We have a robust training program which covers all aspects of my work.”
Recruitment procedures were in place to ensure appropriate checks were carried out on staff before they commenced employment. This information helps employers make safer recruitment decisions.
Medicines were managed safely. We observed medicine administration and staff asked for consent before administering medicines to a people.
Information on people’s medicine allergies was clearly documented to ensure staff awareness. The provider had effective medicine management systems in place and audited medicine administration charts.
People’s communication needs were assessed. Care plans provided staff with information on various way of communicating with people.
Where required, people’s weight were effectively monitored.
Staff had received training in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and told us they respected people's choices and understood the importance of this. Consent was sought from people in accordance with the MCA.
People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the MCA. DoLS authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice, control and freedom over their lives.
Staff told us they always respected and upheld people’s dignity.
People were supported to maintain relationships that were important to them. Relatives visited regularly and this was encouraged.
Staff confirmed they supported people to be as independent as possible. A staff member said, “The Waves encourages people's independence, their own choices, staff supports when it is needed, for example staff encourages people to choose what to wear, what to eat, or how to spend their day, staff encourages to take part in household tasks, like cooking, tidying their room, doing laundry, doing shopping.”
Care plans were detailed and reflected people’s needs.
Relative told us they felt staff knew people well and listened to people and relatives feedback on how their care should be completed.
The provider had a key worker system which meant that there was a staff member monitoring people’s needs.
The provider held regular management meetings, staff meetings and supervisions. Staff spoke positively about the registered manager and told us they felt able to ask for support if needed.
Systems were in place to monitor the service through a programme of regular audits. Regular management meetings were in place to discuss and review audits.
The provider had an up-to-date action plan, which was maintained as a live document.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the service involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the service met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Diane Doherty
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Physical Disability, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)6 inspection reports, latest 2 February 2022. Latest assessment published 12 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Harbour Care (UK) LimitedBrand: Priory Group
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 07838042 (opens Companies House)
Harbour Care (UK) Limited runs 9 services, all in the South West. 9 are rated Good or Outstanding.
Other services run by Harbour Care (UK) Limited
- O The Moorings Outstanding. Care home, Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
- G Anchor House Good. Care home, Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
- G Beach House Good. Care home, Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
- G Coral House Good. Care home, Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
Getting help from BCP Council (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council)
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at BCP Council (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council)
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01202 123 654, Monday to Thursday 9am to 5pm, Friday 9am to 4.30pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: BCP Council (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council)
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does The Waves provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists The Waves as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does The Waves have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 3 beds at The Waves.
- When was The Waves last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for The Waves was published on 12 October 2026.
- Who runs The Waves?
- The Waves is run by Harbour Care (UK) Limited. It runs 9 services, all in the South West.
- What is The Waves's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 12 October 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01202 734857
- Address
- 199 Churchill Road, Parkstone, Poole, BH12 2JD Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- O The Moorings Outstanding, 0.3 miles away
- G The Shores Good, 0.3 miles away
- G The Dunes Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Anchor House Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Alexandra House Good, 0.7 miles away