Rated Care Homes

Greenbanks Care Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2019.

  • 5 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 332 of 445

    rated care homes in Kent are rated Good, like this one.

Greenbanks Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 19 beds, Kent

Rated Good in November 2021.

Greenbanks Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Aspen House Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Bowercroft Care Limited Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. I
    Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing Inadequate, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    The Grove Residential Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. RI
    Mont Calm Residential Home Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Maidstone

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 27 November 2021. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Greenbanks Care Home is a residential care home providing personal care to 18 people aged 65 and over, some of whom were living with Dementia, at the time of the inspection. The service can support up to 19 people, within one adapted building

What inspectors found

People and their relatives told us they felt people living at the service were safe. Staff and management knew how to identify potential signs of abuse and how to escalate concerns to keep people safe. Accidents and incidents were reviewed by management to ensure they were dealt with safely and prevent reoccurrences.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

There were sufficient numbers of staff deployed across the service to support people safely. The provider had safe recruitment practices and staff were well supported to ensure they had the skills to complete their duties. Infection control procedures were in place to help prevent the spread of infection.

Risks to people's health, well-being and environmental safety were assessed and managed to support people to stay safe. People received their medicines safely as prescribed. Staff were knowledgeable about people and were able to meet people's needs in line with individual wishes and preferences.

Staff supported people to maintain healthy lifestyles. They worked in partnership with other healthcare professionals to ensure people's specific physical and mental health needs were met as well as their nutrition and hydration needs.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

People and their relatives told us staff were kind and caring. Staff told us they maintained people's dignity whenever they supported them. People were supported by staff to make choices and encouraged to be as independent as possible.

The service was supporting people who were receiving end of their life care at the time of the inspection. These people were supported by staff in line with their wishes, and to maintain their dignity and comfort.

People received personalised care. Staff engaged people in activities that they enjoyed and supported people to maintain relationships with those important to them. People and their relatives knew how to make complaints but had not needed to.

People, relatives and staff said they felt the service was well-led. The provider and registered manager had

created a positive culture within the service. Everyone we spoke to felt engaged in the service, able to share their views and that these would be listened to by management.

The registered manager had ensured the quality of the service through their quality assurance processes. The provider and registered manager were continually looking to improve the service through developments and learning.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. The last rating is 5 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Kelly Wright
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 27 November 2021. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
11049334 (opens Companies House)

Dhyani Care Limited runs 2 services, all in the South East. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Dhyani Care Limited

  1. G
    Fairlawn Residential Home Good. Care home, Kent

Getting help from Kent County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Greenbanks Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Greenbanks Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Greenbanks Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 19 beds at Greenbanks Care Home.
When was Greenbanks Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Greenbanks Care Home was published on 27 November 2021.
Who runs Greenbanks Care Home?
Greenbanks Care Home is run by Dhyani Care Limited. It runs 2 services, all in the South East.
What is Greenbanks Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 27 November 2021.

Contact

Phone
01622 755859
Address
31 Buckland Road, Maidstone, ME16 0SL Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Aspen House Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. G
    Bowercroft Care Limited Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. I
    Pilgrims Way Care Home with Nursing Inadequate, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    The Grove Residential Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. RI
    Mont Calm Residential Home Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away

See all care homes in Kent

See all care homes in Maidstone