Rated Care Homes

13a Repton Drive

Care home, Havering, 6 beds

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

13a Repton Drive: inspection record

Care home, 6 beds, Havering

Rated Good in October 2026.

13a Repton Drive: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Inspected and rated 3 times since 2016. Rated Requires improvement in 2016, then Good in 2017 and October 2026.

The latest rating was published this month.

How it compares locally

  • One of 46 Good care homes in Havering, out of 51 with a rating.
  • Smaller than 9 in 10 care homes in Havering.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 21 October 2026 (assessment visit 18 August 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

About the service

13a Repton Drive is registered to accommodate 6 people with profound and multiple learning and physical disabilities. People are accommodated in a purpose-built bungalow. At the time of our inspection, the service was providing care and support to 6 people.

Read the full summary

Who the service is for

This is a specialist service for people with a physical disability, learning disability and autistic people. We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence, and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

Key findings

We carried out this assessment on 24 September 2026 to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on if we found any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. Staff and management worked within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) authorisations were appropriately applied for and overseen. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions they had choice, control and freedom over their lives.

People told us they felt safe with the staff. A person said, “I do” when we asked them if they felt safe at the service. A relative told us, “I am very happy with home and the staff that work there.” Staff had undertaken training to support their knowledge and understanding of how to keep people safe. They were aware of their responsibilities to protect people from harm.

We found accidents and incidents were recorded in detail and were investigated by the registered manager to minimise them from happening again.

Potential risks about people’s safety were assessed to ensure they were supported to remain as safe as possible. The provider had a system to ensure all equipment was maintained and serviced.

People were supported by staff who had the knowledge and skills required to meet their needs. There were enough staff employed by the service to meet the needs of the people.

The provider had suitable arrangements to protect people using the service against risks associated with the unsafe management of medicines.

People's needs were assessed before they started using the service. The registered manager worked closely with health and social care professionals to monitor the health of people.

People were encouraged to contribute and have their say about the care and support they received. There were policies and procedures for staff to follow.

The provider was committed to challenging any form of discrimination it encountered. People were treated equally regardless of their abilities, background, lifestyle, values, beliefs and their cultures were respected.

People received care and support in accordance with their preferences, interests and diverse needs. Care plans were comprehensive and this helped to ensure staff had the information they needed to meet people's needs.

People's privacy and dignity was maintained. Staff encouraged people to maintain their independence as much as possible.

The registered manager operated an ‘open door’ policy. They were in regular contact with people, relatives and staff to ensure the service ran smoothly.

Staff felt supported to carry out their duties and said that the registered manager was always available to support them in their roles.

There were a range of monitoring and audit tools to assess and monitor the delivery of care and support to people. Feedback about the service was received and analysed to help improve the experience of people as much as possible.

Staff demonstrated a good understanding of people’s individual needs, preferences, and personal circumstances, enabling them to develop positive, respectful, and trusting relationships.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment, we rated this key question as good. At this assessment, the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment, we rated this key question as good. At this assessment, the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment, we rated this key question as good. At this assessment, the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment, we rated this key question as good. At this assessment, the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment, we rated this key question as good. At this assessment, the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  • Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  • Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Contact and registration details

Details for 13a Repton Drive
AddressSarnett House, 13A Repton Drive, Romford, RM2 5LP
NeighbourhoodGidea Park, Havering
Phone01708 750957
Websitewww.avenuesgroup.org.uk
Registered managerMichael Steeples
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
  • Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
  • Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder
  • Older People
  • Physical Disability
  • Younger Adults
Inspection reports 3 inspection reports, latest 25 October 2017 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) Latest assessment published 21 October 2026; CQC's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider details for 13a Repton Drive
ProviderAvenues LondonBrand: The Avenues Trust
Ownership typeOrganisation
Companies House number06858705 (opens Companies House)
Charity number1130445

Avenues London runs 4 services in London. 2 are rated Good or Outstanding and 2 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Avenues London

  1. G
    Neave Crescent Care home, Havering
    Good
  2. RI
    Avenues London - 1a Webb Road Care home, Greenwich
    Requires improvement
  3. RI
    Glebe House Care home, Havering
    Requires improvement

Nearest alternatives

  1. G
    Nightingale House Care home, 0.2 miles away
    Good
  2. G
    Parkside Care home, 0.2 miles away
    Good
  3. G
    Ashgate House Care home, 0.4 miles away
    Good
  4. G
    Ashking House Care home, 0.4 miles away
    Good
  5. G
    Manor Lodge Care home, 0.5 miles away
    Good

See all care homes in Havering

Getting help from London Borough of Havering

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does 13a Repton Drive provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists 13a Repton Drive as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does 13a Repton Drive have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 6 beds at 13a Repton Drive.
When was 13a Repton Drive last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for 13a Repton Drive was published on 21 October 2026.
Who runs 13a Repton Drive?
13a Repton Drive is run by Avenues London. It runs 4 services in London.
What is 13a Repton Drive's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 21 October 2026.