Rated Care Homes

Community Careline Services

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Requires improvement.

  • 4 years

    since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.

  • 6 of 32

    rated home care services in Rochdale are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Community Careline Services: inspection record

Home care, Rochdale

Rated Requires improvement in July 2022, up from Inadequate.

Community Careline Services: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Short Term Assessment and Re-ablement Service (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and City Care Solutions Ltd (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Short Term Assessment and Re-ablement Service Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    NuvoCare Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Acre Homecare Ltd Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    City Care Solutions Ltd Good, 0.2 miles away
  5. RI
    Dale Care and Support Ltd Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away

See all home care services in Rochdale

See all home care services in Central Rochdale

About the service

From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 6 July 2022. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Community Careline Services is a domiciliary care service, providing personal care to people in their own homes. At the time of our inspection there were 22 people using the service.

What inspectors found

The service supported people with taking their medicines however the medicines were not always managed safely. Risk assessments were in place however, these were brief and lacked personalisation. Where risks required addressing, there was no record to confirm they had been undertaken. Staff were safely recruited. However, where gaps in the records were noted with long term staff, the manager told us they would develop a system to confirm these staff were suitable to work with vulnerable people . The provider was planning to introduce a new electronic system to monitor visits. We received some feedback that visits were occasionally missed or late and people felt the service would benefit from more staff. People told us they felt safe, a system had been developed for incident and accident recording, there was some evidence of lessons learned.

Read the rest of CQC's summary

Training was being undertaken by staff. Staff told us there was sufficient training for them to undertake their role. People who used the service were confident in the skills of the staff team. Some staff fed back the training would be better spread over some time. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. Consent had been recorded in staff files and consent was sought by staff. People told us they had been involved in the development of the care plans but not always in reviews. Records contained information about their GP to enable staff to seek support and review if required.

People received good care and they were treated with dignity and respect. People provided positive feedback. Policies, guidance and training was available to support good care delivery to people. Care records had been developed however, they were brief and required details about individual needs. Records included information about supporting people with their communication, the service was in the process of introducing a new electronic system for care records. There was some evidence people were supported in activities of their choosing. A system had been developed to record complaints. The records would benefit from more detail in relation to the concerns and the actions taken as a result.

Where audits forms had been developed these had not always been commenced. These would have identified the shortfalls found at this inspection. Regional audits and monitoring had been undertaken however these did not identify the findings we found at the inspection. The call logging system was not being used to monitor the calls. Some people told us they knew who the manager was and was positive about the management of the service. However, others told us about difficulties communicating with the office and one said the service lacked consistency of management. The manager told us about the changes they had made and the improvements planned going forward. Questionnaires had been sent to people and

the initial feedback from the manager was positive. There was good information on display in the office along with certificate of registration and employer liability insurance.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 6 July 2022. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 6 July 2022. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. The last rating is 4 years old. Ask what has changed since then.

Registration details

Registered manager
Stacey Manjoro
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 6 July 2022. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02390325 (opens Companies House)

RochCare (UK) Ltd runs 5 services, all in the North West. 3 are rated Good or Outstanding and 2 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by RochCare (UK) Ltd

  1. G
    Bank Hall Care Centre Good. Care home, Lancashire
  2. G
    Coniston House Care Home Good. Care home, Lancashire
  3. G
    Royley House Care Home Good. Care home, Oldham
  4. RI
    Pendle Brook Care Home Requires improvement. Care home, Lancashire

Getting help from Rochdale Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Community Careline Services provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Community Careline Services.
When was Community Careline Services last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Community Careline Services was published on 6 July 2022.
Who runs Community Careline Services?
Community Careline Services is run by RochCare (UK) Ltd. It runs 5 services, all in the North West.
What is Community Careline Services's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 6 July 2022.

Contact

Phone
01706 643433
Address
75-77 Drake Street, Rochdale, OL16 1SB Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Short Term Assessment and Re-ablement Service (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and City Care Solutions Ltd (Good, 0.2 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
    Short Term Assessment and Re-ablement Service Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    NuvoCare Not yet rated, 0.1 miles away
  3. –
    Acre Homecare Ltd Not yet rated, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    City Care Solutions Ltd Good, 0.2 miles away
  5. RI
    Dale Care and Support Ltd Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away

See all home care services in Rochdale

See all home care services in Central Rochdale