Rated Care Homes

Classic Home Care Services Limited

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    First rated Good in 2016, most recently Good in August 2026.

  • 2 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 177 of 209

    rated home care services in Surrey are rated Good, like this one.

Classic Home Care Services Limited: inspection record

Home care, Surrey

Rated Good in August 2026.

Classic Home Care Services Limited: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 10 August 2026 (assessment visit 26 July 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

We assessed Classic Home Care Services on 1 and 3 August 2026. The service provides care and support to people living in their own homes, including people with health needs, mobility needs, dementia and mental health needs. Care records showed people’s needs and risks were assessed and regularly reviewed.
The Care Quality Commission (CQC) regulates the personal care and support that people may receive. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.
We completed this assessment remotely, which means we did not physically visit the office location.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Staff had detailed guidance to support people with medicines, nutrition, personal care, mobility, catheter care, pressure care, anxiety and communication needs. Care plans were person-centred and reflected people’s routines, preferences and what mattered to them.
People and relatives were positive about the service. They told us staff were kind, reliable, respectful and well trained, and that they felt safe and well looked after. People said communication with the office was good and they knew who to contact if they had concerns. Staff also gave positive feedback about training, teamwork, approachable managers and the culture of the service. The provider had systems to review incidents, complaints, spot checks, medicines and staff development. Incidents were managed appropriately, with evidence of safeguarding referrals, Duty of Candour, learning and action to reduce future risk.
We found some governance shortfalls in recruitment records, including gaps in evidence relating to references, DBS checks at the point of recruitment and health declarations. We fed back to the provider that some files needed stronger evidence around medical fitness. The provider has since taken action to address this.
Overall, we found a caring, responsive and learning culture, with leaders and staff focused on supporting people safely, respectfully and in line with their choices.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
    At our last inspection this key question was rated good. At this inspection this has remained the same. This meant This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Sarah Redwood
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 16 February 2021. Latest assessment published 10 August 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04081444 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Surrey County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Classic Home Care Services Limited provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Classic Home Care Services Limited.
When was Classic Home Care Services Limited last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Classic Home Care Services Limited was published on 10 August 2026.
Who runs Classic Home Care Services Limited?
Classic Home Care Services Limited is run by Classic Home Care Services Limited.
What is Classic Home Care Services Limited's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 10 August 2026.