Rated Care Homes

Martin Grange

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.

  • 7 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 110 of 126

    rated home care services in North Yorkshire are rated Good, like this one.

Martin Grange: inspection record

Home care, North Yorkshire

Rated Good in March 2026.

Martin Grange: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
  2. RI
    Home Instead Requires improvement, 0.6 miles away
  3. G
    Kings Care At Home Good, 0.6 miles away
  4. –
    UBU - Harrogate No overall rating, 0.6 miles away
  5. G
    Sova Healthcare Harrogate Good, 0.7 miles away

See all home care services in North Yorkshire

See all home care services in Harrogate

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 26 March 2026 (assessment visit 7 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment:09 February to 23February2026.This assessment was carried out remotely and we did not visit the office. Martin Grange is a domiciliary care agency registered to provide personal care to people in their own homes. Martin Grange is situated in an assisted living retirement community. At the time of our assessment there were10 people receiving support with personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

People’s needs were assessed before they began receiving the service. The information gathered was used to ensure they received person-centred care and support, which was clearly documented in their care plans. Risk assessments were also completed to help minimise potential risks and ensure that people received safe and appropriate care.

People were safeguarded from the risk of harm and abuse. Staff supporting them had the knowledge and confidence to recognise safeguarding concerns and understood their responsibilities to report any accidents, incidents, or concerns appropriately.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests.

Medicines were handled and administered safely. Staff completed appropriate training in medicines management and had their competency assessed before they were permitted to support individuals with their medication.

Effective systems were established to oversee and monitor the quality of the service. Accidents, incidents and safeguarding concerns were regularly reviewed to promote safety and ensure appropriate action was taken when required. Both people using the service and staff were given opportunities to share their feedback. Feedback received reflected positive views about the overall management of the service.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Annette Clapham
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 6 October 2017. Latest assessment published 26 March 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Methodist HomesBrand: Methodist Homes
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04043124 (opens Companies House)
Charity number
1083995

Methodist Homes runs 93 services in England, 16 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber. 83 are rated Good or Outstanding and 10 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Methodist Homes

  1. O
    Briar Hill House Outstanding. Care home with nursing, Staffordshire, West Midlands
  2. O
    Horfield Lodge Outstanding. Care home with nursing, Bristol, South West
  3. O
    Mapplewell Manor Outstanding. Care home, Barnsley
  4. O
    Queens Court Outstanding. Care home, Cambridgeshire, East of England

See all 93 services run by Methodist Homes

Getting help from North Yorkshire Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Martin Grange provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Martin Grange.
When was Martin Grange last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Martin Grange was published on 26 March 2026.
Who runs Martin Grange?
Martin Grange is run by Methodist Homes. It runs 93 services in England, 16 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber.
What is Martin Grange's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 26 March 2026.