Rated Care Homes

Helping Hands Godalming

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2018.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • 177 of 209

    rated home care services in Surrey are rated Good, like this one.

Helping Hands Godalming: inspection record

Home care, Surrey

Rated Good in October 2026.

Helping Hands Godalming: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 20 October 2026 (assessment visit 1 October 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

The assessment took place between 9 and 12 October 2026. Helping Hands Godalming is a domiciliary care service providing personal and nursing care to people in their own homes. The service supports older people and people living with dementia and physical disabilities. At the time of the assessment 41 people were receiving regulated support. There was a delegated nursing team employed to oversee any nursing tasks.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) regulates the personal care and support that people may receive. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care and nursing care. This includes help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating, and nursing tasks. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided.
We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

At the time of the assessment, the service was not supporting any autistic people or people with a learning disability, but the provider had regard to ‘Right support, right care, right culture

People and relatives were positive about the care provided and told us they felt safe. They described staff as kind, respectful, reliable and professional. Care was personalised around people’s needs, preferences, routines and desired outcomes. Staff promoted people’s independence, dignity and choice and responded flexibly when their needs changed.
Staff understood their safeguarding responsibilities and worked with healthcare professionals when people required additional support. Medicines, infection risks and environmental risks were generally managed safely. However, some minor improvements were needed to ensure risks, including choking risks, were consistently recorded across all relevant documents. Recruitment checks also required further scrutiny. Leaders had systems to monitor quality, but these did not always result in timely or sustained improvements. Learning from incidents, complaints and audits was taking place however was not always clearly recorded or embedded. Staff described the manager and office team as approachable, although changes in office staff and management capacity had caused some instability. Overall, the service had a caring, person-centred culture, and staff were proud of the positive outcomes they helped people achieve.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
    This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
    This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
    This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
    This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Michelle McMahon
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 12 July 2018. Latest assessment published 20 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Midshires Care LimitedBrand: Midshires Care Ltd
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03959933 (opens Companies House)

Midshires Care Limited runs 151 services in England, 24 of them in the South East. 131 are rated Good or Outstanding, 3 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 17 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Midshires Care Limited

  1. G
    Helping Hands Accrington Good. Home care, Lancashire, North West
  2. G
    Helping Hands Aintree Good. Home care, Liverpool, North West
  3. G
    Helping Hands Arnold Good. Home care, Nottinghamshire, East Midlands
  4. G
    Helping Hands Barnet Good. Home care, Enfield, London

See all 151 services run by Midshires Care Limited

Getting help from Surrey County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Helping Hands Godalming provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Helping Hands Godalming.
When was Helping Hands Godalming last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Helping Hands Godalming was published on 20 October 2026.
Who runs Helping Hands Godalming?
Helping Hands Godalming is run by Midshires Care Limited. It runs 151 services in England, 24 of them in the South East.
What is Helping Hands Godalming's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 20 October 2026.