Rated Care Homes

Grande Care Ltd

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 14 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 70 of 85

    rated home care services in Warwickshire are rated Good, like this one.

Grande Care Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Warwickshire

Rated Good in August 2025, up from Requires improvement.

Grande Care Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 5 August 2025 (assessment visit 4 June 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 14 July to 22 July 20025. This service is a homecare service providing personal care to adults of all ages, people with dementia, mental health conditions, a physical disability and a sensory impairment. At the time of the inspection 4 people were receiving personal care support.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

This assessment was carried out to follow up on action we told the provider to take at the last assessment. During this assessment we spoke with people who used the service, their relatives, staff, the registered manager and sought feedback from other healthcare professionals. We looked at care plans, recruitment files and quality assurance records. The provider was previously in breach of the legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment and good governance. Improvements were found at this assessment and the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations.

Following our last inspection, the registered manager had completed further qualifications to ensure their effective management of the service and compliance with legislative requirements. The registered manager had worked with people, their relatives and staff to build a culture focused on putting people at the centre of their support and where staff felt able to speak up, confident their voice would be heard. Staff described the registered manager as visible, supportive and encouraging of their professional development.

Risks to people's health had been identified and there was a joined-up approach to risk management. Staff understood their role in keeping people safe and reporting any concerns they had about people’s health, wellbeing or safety. Checks were in place to ensure staff followed current best practice to reduce the risk of any infections spreading. Staff received training on medicines administration which included checks of their competency. Improvements had been made in the management of ‘as required’ medicines. However, we found medicines care plans required more detail to reflect people’s capacity and independence and to ensure accurate records were maintained.

People had a robust assessment of their needs before they began using the service to ensure their needs and preferences could be effectively met. The registered manager made referrals to, and worked with, other external health and social care teams which helped to ensure continuity of care. Staff described good communication and teamwork to ensure people received the support they needed, when they needed it.

People received support that was tailored to their individual needs and delivered by a core team of staff who knew them well. The registered manager promoted effective communication and recognised the importance of providing people and their families with regular opportunities to share their feedback about the service provided.

People's equality and diversity needs were understood and supported by the service. Staff gave people choices about how they lived and were able to explain how they enabled people to maintain independence in their home.

The registered manager had a 12-month service improvement plan with planned strategies and budgets for achieving the actions identified.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Amrit Kaur
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 1 March 2023. Latest assessment published 5 August 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
10555416 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Warwickshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Grande Care Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Grande Care Ltd.
When was Grande Care Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Grande Care Ltd was published on 5 August 2025.
Who runs Grande Care Ltd?
Grande Care Ltd is run by Grande Care Ltd.
What is Grande Care Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 5 August 2025.