Rated Care Homes

Keem Healthcare Ltd

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 13 of 85

    rated home care services in Warwickshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Keem Healthcare Ltd: inspection record

Home care, Warwickshire

Rated Requires improvement in July 2026.

Keem Healthcare Ltd: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Bluebird Care (Stratford & Warwick) (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Grande Care Ltd (Good, 0.6 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
  2. G
    Grande Care Ltd Good, 0.6 miles away
  3. G
  4. G
    Housing 21 - Rohan Gardens Good, 1.1 miles away
  5. –
    Warwickshire Supported Living No overall rating, 1.8 miles away

See all home care services in Warwickshire

See all home care services in Warwick

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 13 July 2026 (assessment visit 18 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 08 June to 12 June 2026. Keem Healthcare is a domiciliary care agency providing home care services to younger and older people who live in their own homes. Those people staff supported may be with living with dementia or have a learning disability, autism, mental health diagnosis or a sensory impairment.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

At the time of this assessment, Keem Healthcare were providing personal care to 2 people whose care package involved 24-hour support from staff. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene, eating and drinking. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. This was the first assessment of this service since registration, and we reviewed all 5 key questions.

As part of our assessment, we were unable to speak with people and relatives. We spoke with staff, the registered manager and the operations manager. We reviewed both care plans, medication records, recruitment files and quality assurance records, plus the provider’s electronic systems to manage care calls and staff allocation.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

People’s risks were not always recorded clearly in their care plans. People’s care information did not always contain clear and personalised plans to guide staff on how to care for people with specific health or mental health conditions. The registered manager completed audits and checks however those audits did not always look at the right things, to assure themselves that all aspects of service delivery was to the standards expected. In some cases, there was no evidence of what had been checked and how those checks led to an improved service. We found 2 breaches of regulation relating to safe care and treatment and good governance. In instances where the Care Quality Commission (CQC) have decided to take civil or criminal enforcement action against a provider, we will publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded.

Pre-admission assessments were completed to make sure the provider was able to provide the care people required.

Staff received training to meet people’s needs and people received support from external health professionals. Staff wore personal protective equipment to protect people from infection risks. Staff were complimentary about working at the service and the registered manager was confident they had the right staff to support people because they cared.

  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant people were not always safe and protected from avoidable harm.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment at the service.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant the service was not always consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created did not always promote high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance at the service.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 13 July 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 13 July 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  3. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.

Registration details

Registered manager
Kudzaishe Muzungu
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
13305117 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Warwickshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Keem Healthcare Ltd provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Keem Healthcare Ltd.
When was Keem Healthcare Ltd last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Keem Healthcare Ltd was published on 13 July 2026.
Who runs Keem Healthcare Ltd?
Keem Healthcare Ltd is run by Keem Healthcare Ltd.
What is Keem Healthcare Ltd's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 13 July 2026.

Contact

Phone
07898 266345
Address
Office 4, 7 Old Square, Warwick, CV34 4RA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Bluebird Care (Stratford & Warwick) (Good, 0.2 miles away) and Grande Care Ltd (Good, 0.6 miles away).

Nearest home care services:

  1. G
  2. G
    Grande Care Ltd Good, 0.6 miles away
  3. G
  4. G
    Housing 21 - Rohan Gardens Good, 1.1 miles away
  5. –
    Warwickshire Supported Living No overall rating, 1.8 miles away

See all home care services in Warwickshire

See all home care services in Warwick