Rated Care Homes

Furlong House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2019.

  • 2 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 30 of 39

    rated home care services in Walsall are rated Good, like this one.

Furlong House: inspection record

Home care, Walsall

Rated Good in August 2026.

Furlong House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Walsall Domiciliary Care Service Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Five Star Support Good, 0.2 miles away
  3. –
    Saving Care Ltd Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Housing 21 - Mattesley Court Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. G
    Ability Healthcare Cannock Ltd Good, 0.4 miles away

See all home care services in Walsall

See all home care services in Bloxwich

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 24 August 2026 (assessment visit 25 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 24 to 30 July 2026. The service is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care to adults of all ages living with learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, mental health, physical disabilities, dementia and sensory impairment. This assessment was carried out due to the age of the current rating.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’. This guidance supported judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choice, independence and access to local communities that most people take for granted.

The provider had systems in place to ensure people received safe care. People were safeguarded from the risk of abuse. Medicines were administered safely and risks to people were assessed and planned for. When things went wrong lessons were learned. Environmental risks were considered and systems were in place to manage the risk of cross infection. There were systems in place to provide staff with support and ongoing training.

The providers systems were effective in supporting people. People had their needs assessed using evidence-based tools and a care plan was in place and reviewed regularly. People received support in accordance with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and staff respected people’s choices and decisions. Staff worked as a team and collaborated with other professionals to meet people’s needs, including their health needs.

Systems were in place to ensure people received care and support from a caring and responsive staff team. Processes ensured people had their independence promoted and could make choices about their care. Person-centred care plans were in place which considered peoples individual needs and preferences. Staff were also supported in their roles with polices and processes to ensure equity.

The provider had systems in place to ensure the service was well-led. Systems checked the quality of the service people received and everyone was clear about their roles and responsibilities. The provider sought feedback from people, relatives and staff and acted on this. Learning processes were in place and the provider worked closely with partners.

However, improvements were needed to ensure staff were consistently safely recruited to the service. The provider was taking action to address this at the time of our inspection.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 26 April 2019. Latest assessment published 24 August 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
GreenSquareAccord LimitedBrand: Accord Housing Association Limited
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
RS027052 (opens Companies House)

GreenSquareAccord Limited runs 16 services, all in the West Midlands. 14 are rated Good or Outstanding and 2 have no rating yet.

Other services run by GreenSquareAccord Limited

  1. G
    1a West Avenue Good. Care home, Solihull
  2. G
    23 Trittiford Road Good. Care home, Birmingham
  3. G
    53a Ipstones Avenue Good. Care home, Birmingham
  4. G
    Arden Grove Good. Home care, Coventry

See all 16 services run by GreenSquareAccord Limited

Getting help from Walsall Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Furlong House provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Furlong House.
When was Furlong House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Furlong House was published on 24 August 2026.
Who runs Furlong House?
Furlong House is run by GreenSquareAccord Limited. It runs 16 services, all in the West Midlands.
What is Furlong House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 24 August 2026.