Rated Care Homes

Helping Hands Epsom

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2019.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 177 of 209

    rated home care services in Surrey are rated Good, like this one.

Helping Hands Epsom: inspection record

Home care, Surrey

Rated Good in July 2026.

Helping Hands Epsom: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    AM2PM Quality Care Limited Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    TLC Homecare Ltd Not yet rated, 1.1 miles away
  3. –
    CN Healthcare Limited No overall rating, 1.3 miles away
  4. G
  5. G

See all home care services in Surrey

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 30 July 2026 (assessment visit 29 June 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

About the service

The service is a domiciliary care agency providing care to people in their own homes. There were 60 people using the service at the time of the inspection.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Who the service is for

This service supports older people, people living with dementia, and people with physical disabilities who are living in their own homes.

We carried out this assessment from 6 July to 16 July 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

The management team had created a warm and inclusive service that clearly valued both the people it supported and staff members. Staff were supported through hardships in a variety of ways and were provided with praise and positive feedback. Staff told us they felt supported, with comments including, “The management team are approachable and supportive. Recently I have had a family issue, and they were very supportive and they regularly check in on me and provide support throughout the difficult times and given me advice and they make sure that I’m coping”, and “I have felt supported from day 1 and feel part of the team. From the day I first came into the office I have felt that the office team are very professional and polite and always give credit where it is due.”


Staff were aware of their responsibility to safeguard people from the risk of abuse and harm. Care plans and risk assessments around people’s needs were detailed yet concise. These were regularly reviewed and updated, with people and their relatives being involved in this process. Staff were safely recruited and were provided with regular training to support them with the knowledge and skills required to deliver safe care. Medicine recording and administration processes were safe. Staff were aware of the importance of gaining consent before delivering care.

Staff were proud to work for the service. One staff member told us, “It is a pleasure to work for [the service] and we feel like 'family'.” Any shortfalls in care were identified through thorough quality governance audits, with appropriate action being taken to resolve in a timely manner. Accidents, incidents and concerns were used as a learning source to improve the service going forward.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Fiona Bourne
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 19 January 2019. Latest assessment published 30 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Midshires Care LimitedBrand: Midshires Care Ltd
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03959933 (opens Companies House)

Midshires Care Limited runs 151 services in England, 24 of them in the South East. 131 are rated Good or Outstanding, 3 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 17 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Midshires Care Limited

  1. G
    Helping Hands Accrington Good. Home care, Lancashire, North West
  2. G
    Helping Hands Aintree Good. Home care, Liverpool, North West
  3. G
    Helping Hands Arnold Good. Home care, Nottinghamshire, East Midlands
  4. G
    Helping Hands Barnet Good. Home care, Enfield, London

See all 151 services run by Midshires Care Limited

Getting help from Surrey County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Helping Hands Epsom provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Helping Hands Epsom.
When was Helping Hands Epsom last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Helping Hands Epsom was published on 30 July 2026.
Who runs Helping Hands Epsom?
Helping Hands Epsom is run by Midshires Care Limited. It runs 151 services in England, 24 of them in the South East.
What is Helping Hands Epsom's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 30 July 2026.

Contact

Phone
01737 517441
Address
3 Eastgate, Banstead, SM7 1RN Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    AM2PM Quality Care Limited Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    TLC Homecare Ltd Not yet rated, 1.1 miles away
  3. –
    CN Healthcare Limited No overall rating, 1.3 miles away
  4. G
  5. G

See all home care services in Surrey