Rated Care Homes

Kinetic Nursing Services

O

Outstanding

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Good to Outstanding.

  • 7 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 2 of 36

    rated home care services in Rotherham are rated Outstanding, like this one.

Kinetic Nursing Services: inspection record

Home care, Rotherham

Rated Outstanding in March 2026, up from Good.

Kinetic Nursing Services: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Cera - Yorkshire South & West Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Home Healthcare Delivery - Rotherham Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. RI
    Sense- Community Services and Supported Living Services (North) Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. –
    Priority Choice Health Care Limited Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  5. G
    TLB24/7 Healthcare Ltd - DCA Good, 0.5 miles away

See all home care services in Rotherham

See all home care services in Central Rotherham

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 12 March 2026 (assessment visit 19 November 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 8 December 2025 – 8 January 2026. Kinetic Nursing Services is a care at home service providing personal care and support to adults of all ages some of whom were living with dementia, physical disabilities and learning disabilities. Not everyone using the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of this assessment there were 123 people receiving care and support. We inspected the service because of the length of the time since our last inspection. We reviewed all key questions and quality statements. The outcome of this assessment was a rating for the service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Outstanding
  • Responsive Outstanding
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The service supported people with a learning disability and autistic people. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities most people take for granted. We were assured the service provided safe and effective care and support for people with a learning disability and autistic people.

The provider had a positive culture of safety, based on openness and honesty. Staff listened to concerns about safety and investigated and reported safety events. The provider shared concerns quickly and appropriately and there were appropriate policies, systems and processes in place to keep people safe. Members of staff provided care to meet people’s needs which was safe, supportive and enabled people to do the things which mattered to them. Care plans were person-centred and risk assessments were completed appropriately which ensured care was delivered in line with care plans. The provider made sure there were always enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff, who received support, supervision and strong development opportunities. They worked together well to provide safe care which met people’s individual needs. The provider made sure medicines and treatments were safe and met people’s needs, capacities and preferences.

The provider made sure people’s care and treatment was effective by assessing and reviewing their health, care, wellbeing and communication needs with them. The provider had developed good working relationships with local health and care professionals which supported joined up work and improved outcomes for people. Members of staff supported people to live healthier lives and where possible, reduce their future needs for care and support. The provider told people about their rights around consent and respected these when delivering person-centred care and treatment. People were supported to give consent about their care and support and members of staff kept people informed about care and choice options.

The provider treated people with kindness, empathy and compassion and respected their privacy and dignity. The provider treated people as individuals and made sure people’s care, support and treatment met people’s needs and preferences. People were supported to live independent lives and make decisions about their care and support. The provider cared about and promoted the wellbeing of their staff and supported and enabled staff to deliver person-centred care.

The provider made sure people were at the centre of their care and treatment choices and they decided, in partnership with people, how to respond to any relevant changes in people’s needs. The provider had a good understanding of the diverse health and care needs of people and their local communities, so care was joined-up, flexible and supported choice and continuity. The provider enabled people to share feedback and ideas, or raise complaints about their care, treatment and support. Members of staff involved people in decisions about their care and told them what had changed as a result. Members of staff and leaders listened to information about people who are most likely to experience inequality in experience or outcomes. People were supported to plan for important life changes, so they could have enough time to make informed decisions about their future, including at the end of their life.

The provider had a clear shared vision, strategy and culture. This was based on transparency, equity, equality and human rights, diversity and inclusion, engagement, and an understanding of the challenges and the needs of people and their communities. The provider had inclusive leaders at all levels who understood the context in which they delivered care, treatment and support and embodied the culture and values of their workforce and organisation. The provider valued diversity in their workforce. They had an inclusive and fair culture which had improved equality and equity for people who worked for them. The provider had clear responsibilities, roles, systems of accountability and good governance. They used these to manage and deliver good quality, sustainable care, treatment and support. The provider focussed on continuous learning, innovation and improvement across the organisation and local system. They always encouraged creative ways of delivering equality of experience, outcome and quality of life for people.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Outstanding

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant people were truly respected and valued as individuals; and empowered as partners in their care in an exceptional service.

  4. Responsive

    Outstanding

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question outstanding. At this assessment the rating has remained outstanding. This meant services were tailored to meet the needs of individuals and delivered to ensure flexibility, choice and continuity of care.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Joanne Clark
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 6 August 2021. Latest assessment published 12 March 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
07403680 (opens Companies House)

Getting help from Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Kinetic Nursing Services provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Kinetic Nursing Services.
When was Kinetic Nursing Services last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Kinetic Nursing Services was published on 12 March 2026.
Who runs Kinetic Nursing Services?
Kinetic Nursing Services is run by Kinetic Nursing Services Limited.
What is Kinetic Nursing Services's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Outstanding, published on 12 March 2026.

Contact

Phone
01709 839395
Address
Unit 11, Ashley Business Court, Rawmarsh Road, Rotherham, S60 1RU Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Cera - Yorkshire South & West Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Home Healthcare Delivery - Rotherham Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  3. RI
    Sense- Community Services and Supported Living Services (North) Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
  4. –
    Priority Choice Health Care Limited Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
  5. G
    TLB24/7 Healthcare Ltd - DCA Good, 0.5 miles away

See all home care services in Rotherham

See all home care services in Central Rotherham