Crewton Care
- Home care
- Registered since 2020
- Central Leicester, Leicester, East Midlands
No overall rating
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.
At a glance
3 ratings
Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.
2 years
since the latest rating was published.
82%
of rated home care services in Leicester are Good or Outstanding (85% across the East Midlands, 88% across England).
Crewton Care: inspection record
This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Aspire UK (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Sensitive Care Solutions (Good, 0.3 miles away).
Nearest home care services:
- G Aspire UK Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- RI Kris Carers Ltd Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Sensitive Care Solutions Good, 0.3 miles away
- – Goldcrest Healthcare Service (North) Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
- G A&S Rescue Services Limited Good, 0.3 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 10 July 2024 (assessment visit 24 April 2024). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment 13 May to 6 June 2024. This assessment was in response to concerns raised by a partner organisation relating to the management of the service, medicines, safeguarding, poor record keeping and staff not adhering to people’s support plans. We also considered the breach of regulation in safeguarding identified at the previous CQC inspection. Systems and processes, supported by the provider’s policies and procedures promoted and supported a safe, supportive, personalised and nurturing environment. People were able to meet the staff who would be providing their care before they transferred to the service. A core team of staff supported people. Staff worked with a range of external health and social care professionals to promote people’s health and wellbeing. People’s medicine was managed safely. Staff underwent pre employment checks as part of their recruitment, and received ongoing support including induction, training, supervision and appraisal. Staff were knowledgeable about people’s needs and worked in partnership with people to respond to any changes in need, including recognising and responding to emotional well-being. There was a positive culture where people, their relatives and staff felt confident and supported to share their views. Quality and safety of the service was kept under review through ongoing monitoring. There were clear lines of accountability within the staff and management team, who collaborated with partner agencies to achieve the best outcomes for people. We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
-
Safe
Good
People told us they felt safe, and they and their relatives spoke highly of the support they received. They told us staff were introduced to them before they transferred to the services provided by Crewton Care. People and their relatives were involved in decisions to reduce risk, which included a proactive approach in supporting them to take positive risks to increase their experiences and promote independence. People and their relatives told us support was provided by a core team of staff who understood their needs and who they had developed positive and supportive relationships with. People and their relatives were involved in decisions relating to their medicine.
Safe practices were used to support people to transfer between services this included the development of a transfer plan to support the person with the move.
Staff demonstrated a good understanding of people’s needs and of their role in promoting people’s safety, health and welfare. Staff spoke positively of the support they received to promote and monitor people’s safety. Staff liaised with health and social care partners to promote people’s safety and wellbeing.
Staff underwent a robust recruitment process and received ongoing training and support.
Policies and procedures were in place to promote people’s safety and welfare, which included safeguarding, whistleblowing and staff recruitment practices. Systems and processes were in place which monitored the safety of the care provided, which included audits and the analysis of incidents and events.
-
Effective
Good
People were supported to access health services including health screening and specialist health services. People and their relatives spoke positively of the support provided by staff and the management team to monitor and improve their health. This included providing information and support to enable them to access and understand their health care appointments.
Staff had a good understanding of people’s needs and were knowledgeable as to their role in promoting people’s health and wellbeing. There was effective partnership working between external health and social care professionals, and the management and staff teams. People’s health care needs were clearly documented within their support plans, and records monitoring their health were in place to encourage and promote health and wellbeing. Information was provided in an accessible format to support people in understanding their health care appointments and needs.
-
Responsive
Good
People and relatives spoke of the personalised support they received, which included their pursuit of hobbies and interests, and of accessing services in the community for leisure and recreational purposes.
People’s personalised needs were clearly understood by staff and documented within care records.
-
Well-led
Good
People and relatives were aware of external health and social care professionals who were involved in their care and support, and provided examples of effective partnership working.
Staff spoke positively of the support provided by the management team. Staff told us there was always someone available to provide support and guidance. Staff told us they felt valued and recommended Crewton Care as a good employer.
Systems and processes, supported by policies, were in place which encouraged feedback from people, their relatives and staff. Equality and diversity was understood and supported by processes and policies to support people and staff. Employment practices were flexible to meet the needs of staff considering equality characteristics.
There were effective systems and processes in place to monitor the quality, safety and outcomes of the service, which included audits and seeking the views of people, their relatives and staff.
Effective partnership working enabled, promoted and encouraged the sharing of experience and learning from each other to improve the service provided.
Questions to ask the service
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Blessing Nyatsanza
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Domiciliary care service, Supported living service
- Who it supports
- Older People, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)2 inspection reports, latest 2 June 2023. Latest assessment published 10 July 2024; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Crewton Care Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 12351971 (opens Companies House)
Getting help from Leicester City Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Leicester City Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0116 454 1004, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Leicester City Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Crewton Care provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Crewton Care.
- When was Crewton Care last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Crewton Care was published on 10 July 2024.
- Who runs Crewton Care?
- Crewton Care is run by Crewton Care Limited.
- What is Crewton Care's CQC rating?
- No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.
Contact
- Phone
- 07588 495436
- Address
- Peepul Centre, Orchardson Avenue, Leicester, LE4 6DP Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Aspire UK (Good, less than 0.1 miles away) and Sensitive Care Solutions (Good, 0.3 miles away).
Nearest home care services:
- G Aspire UK Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- RI Kris Carers Ltd Requires improvement, less than 0.1 miles away
- G Sensitive Care Solutions Good, 0.3 miles away
- – Goldcrest Healthcare Service (North) Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
- G A&S Rescue Services Limited Good, 0.3 miles away