Rated Care Homes

Heathcote

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2015.

  • 2 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 173 of 288

    rated care homes in Norfolk are rated Good, like this one.

Heathcote: inspection record

Care home, 29 beds, Norfolk

Rated Good in August 2026.

Heathcote: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Bishop Herbert House Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. O
    St John's House Outstanding, 0.3 miles away
  3. RI
    Whitehall Lodge Residential Home Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  4. O
    Highwater House Outstanding, 0.4 miles away
  5. G
    The Hawthorns Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Norfolk

See all care homes in Norwich

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 24 August 2026 (assessment visit 2 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

We conducted an inspection of Heathcote on 20 April and 22 April 2026. Heathcote is a residential home registered for 28 older adults without nursing. There were 24 people using the service during our inspection. The service is situated in central Norwich and is owned and managed by Black Swan. We looked at all 5 key questions with all quality statements being assessed.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Outstanding
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Everyone arriving at the service received a warm welcome from long standing staff who had built an excellent rapport with people using the service and their visitors. People received timely care and support, and staff helped to enhance people’s day. Staff ensured people had everything they needed including drinks in reach, extra blankets, cushions for comfort and companionship.

Staff worked well as a team and had complimentary skills. Staff had set roles, but some had enhanced skills, or areas of interest such as a medication champion and dignity champion. The wider organisation also had champions who were able to better support staff. All staff spoken with worked outside their main roles at times to ensure the smooth running of the service and prioritise the safety and well-being of people using the service. For example, the registered manager was described as often on the floor helping with medicines or delivering care. Staff on day shift would occasionally cover night shifts when needed by choice as they said this was preferable to agency as they knew their ‘residents.’ Domestic staff said they supported people with laundry, activities and mealtimes where needed. This helped ensure the shift ran smoothly and people spoken with said staff went, "Above and beyond.”

Staff were motivated and supported to develop their skills and competencies with some staff taking the opportunity to seek additional training and progression. Staff nominations every month helped ensure good practice was recognised and rewarded.

The well-being of staff was promoted through safe working practices, robust training, supervision, safe recruitment, and effective quality assurance systems.

There was effective management oversight at all levels. Audits helped to determine where improvements were needed and to assess the safe and effective delivery of the service. The views and wishes of people using the service and the staff delivering the care was paramount.

Incidents, safeguarding concerns, and complaints were recorded and reviewed. However, we found because staff were proactive in meeting people’s needs, they anticipated risk and adjusted peoples care accordingly. Weekly key worker meetings meant that people had clear opportunities to raise any issues about their care and described staff as responsive.

The manager was clear their door was always open, and any concerns were addressed immediately which reduced the need for a formal complaint.

Falls within the service were low and we observed people had appropriate equipment such as sensor mats, personalised alarms, and reviews by appropriate agencies.

Activities were planned and spontaneous. All staff supported people to join in either planned activities or to support people on a one to one to go out either for coffee or shopping, and trips further afield took place annually. Entertainers were booked throughout the year and events such as Easter, Valentine's Day etc were celebrated, which enhanced people’s well-being.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment, and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Outstanding

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity, and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question Outstanding. At this assessment, the rating has remained Outstanding.

    This meant people were truly respected and valued as individuals; and empowered as partners in their care in an exceptional service.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment,the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Sylvia Ames
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 3 March 2022. Latest assessment published 24 August 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02621410 (opens Companies House)

Black Swan International Limited runs 23 services in England, 22 of them in the East of England. 22 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 has no rating yet.

Other services run by Black Swan International Limited

  1. O
    Chiswick House Outstanding. Care home, Norfolk
  2. O
    Nightingale Lodge Outstanding. Care home, Norfolk
  3. O
    The Beeches Outstanding. Care home, Norfolk
  4. G
    Beccles Care Home Good. Care home, Suffolk

See all 23 services run by Black Swan International Limited

Getting help from Norfolk County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Heathcote provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Heathcote as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Heathcote have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 29 beds at Heathcote.
When was Heathcote last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Heathcote was published on 24 August 2026.
Who runs Heathcote?
Heathcote is run by Black Swan International Limited. It runs 23 services in England, 22 of them in the East of England.
What is Heathcote's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 24 August 2026.

Contact

Phone
01603 625639
Address
19-23 Unthank Road, Norwich, NR2 2PA Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Bishop Herbert House Good, 0.2 miles away
  2. O
    St John's House Outstanding, 0.3 miles away
  3. RI
    Whitehall Lodge Residential Home Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  4. O
    Highwater House Outstanding, 0.4 miles away
  5. G
    The Hawthorns Care Home Good, 0.7 miles away

See all care homes in Norfolk

See all care homes in Norwich