Rated Care Homes

Wymeswold Manor

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • 4 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 28 of 148

    rated care homes in Leicestershire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Wymeswold Manor: inspection record

Care home, 32 beds, Leicestershire

Rated Requires improvement in June 2026.

Wymeswold Manor: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: 26 Brookside Avenue (Good, 3.4 miles away) and Derbyshire House Residential Care (Outstanding, 3.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    26 Brookside Avenue Good, 3.4 miles away
  2. O
    Derbyshire House Residential Care Outstanding, 3.5 miles away
  3. G
    Beaumanor Nursing Home Good, 4.1 miles away
  4. RI
    Pinglenook Residential Home Requires improvement, 4.2 miles away
  5. RI
    Jasmine Court Nursing Home Requires improvement, 4.2 miles away

See all care homes in Leicestershire

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 June 2026 (assessment visit 26 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 11 to 15 May 2026. This assessment was undertaken due to being a newly registered service.

Wymeswold Manor is a residential home providing accommodation and personal care for older adults and people living with dementia.The service can accommodate up to 32 adults. At the time of the assessment 28 people were living at the service.

  • Safe Inadequate
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring No rating
  • Responsive No rating
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider was in breach of 4 legal regulations related to safe care and treatment, safe environments, good governance, and safe and effective staffing.

The provider did not always ensure all potential risks to people were understood and managed. People’s care plans lacked guidance in relation to the potential risks associated with their diagnosed medical conditions. Their records were not always up to date, complete or contemporaneous. Medicines were not always managed safely. Guidance was not always available to support staff with the safe management of medicines.

Risks associated with the environment had not always been safely managed. Systems to ensure that staff received all training relevant to their role were not effective. The provider failed to ensure recruitment processes were operated effectively and staff were employed in line with regulatory requirements.

The provider failed to operate effective checks of care quality and safety. The provider’s governance processes did not identify the issues we found during this assessment. Quality assurance systems and processes were not effectively implemented to ensure safety and drive improvement.

Where people lacked mental capacity to consent to their care and treatment, mental capacity assessments and best interest decisions had been completed in accordance with the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Staff were kind, caring, and respectful in their interactions with people. They supported individuals to make informed decisions wherever possible, in line with relevant legislation and best practice. Information was shared appropriately to ensure continuity of care while maintaining confidentiality. Staff worked effectively with other health and social care professionals, promoting joined-up care.

We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to concerns found at this assessment in relation tosafe environments and safe and effective staffing.

In instances where CQC has begun a process of regulatory action, we may publish this information on our website after any representations and/or appeals have been concluded, if the action has been taken forward.

  1. Safe

    Inadequate

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated inadequate. This meant people were not safe and were at risk of avoidable harm.

    The service was in breach of legal regulations in relation to people’s safe care and treatment, safe environments and safe and effective staffing.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.

  3. Caring

    No rating

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant people did not always feel well-supported, cared for or treated with dignity and respect.

  4. Responsive

    No rating

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant people’s needs were not always met.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated requires improvement. This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

    The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Inadequate on 29 June 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 29 June 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Caring was rated Requires improvement on 29 June 2026. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
  4. Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 29 June 2026. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.

Registration details

Registered manager
Samantha Bacon
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Partnership

Broadoak Group of Care Homes runs 17 services, all in the East Midlands. 9 are rated Good or Outstanding, 4 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 4 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Broadoak Group of Care Homes

  1. G
    Broadoak Lodge Good. Care home, Leicestershire
  2. G
    Broadoak Park Good. Care home, Nottinghamshire
  3. G
    Cherry Tree Cottage Good. Care home, Nottinghamshire
  4. G
    Cockington House Good. Care home, Nottingham

See all 17 services run by Broadoak Group of Care Homes

Getting help from Leicestershire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Wymeswold Manor provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Wymeswold Manor as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Wymeswold Manor have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 32 beds at Wymeswold Manor.
When was Wymeswold Manor last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Wymeswold Manor was published on 29 June 2026.
Who runs Wymeswold Manor?
Wymeswold Manor is run by Broadoak Group of Care Homes. It runs 17 services, all in the East Midlands.
What is Wymeswold Manor's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 29 June 2026.

Contact

Address
London Lane, Wymeswold, Loughborough, LE12 6UB Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: 26 Brookside Avenue (Good, 3.4 miles away) and Derbyshire House Residential Care (Outstanding, 3.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    26 Brookside Avenue Good, 3.4 miles away
  2. O
    Derbyshire House Residential Care Outstanding, 3.5 miles away
  3. G
    Beaumanor Nursing Home Good, 4.1 miles away
  4. RI
    Pinglenook Residential Home Requires improvement, 4.2 miles away
  5. RI
    Jasmine Court Nursing Home Requires improvement, 4.2 miles away

See all care homes in Leicestershire