Wellburn House
- Care home
- 35 beds
- No nursing
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2011
- Ovingham, Northumberland, North East
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
5 ratings
Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement.
3 months
since the latest rating was published.
8 of 89
rated care homes in Northumberland are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Wellburn House: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in July 2026, down from Good.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Havendene Residential Home (Good, 0.9 miles away) and Rose Tree House (Good, 1 mile away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Havendene Residential Home Good, 0.9 miles away
- G Rose Tree House Good, 1 mile away
- G Red Brick House Good, 1 mile away
- G New Ridley Road Good, 1.8 miles away
- G Mountview Good, 2.2 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 July 2026 (assessment visit 1 April 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Date of assessment: From 6 May 2026 to 5 June 2026.
This assessment was carried out due to the length of time since we last inspected the service. We visited the service on 6 and 14 May 2026.
- Safe No rating
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
Wellburn House is a care home providing residential and dementia care for up to 35 people over 65 years old. At the time of the assessment, 28 people were living at the home.
The service was also registered to provide support to people with needs arising from substance misuse. However, there were no people receiving care and support with these needs at the time of our assessment.
During our assessment, we found several areas where improvements were required.
On the first day we visited the service, we identified the service did not always provide a homely environment where people were safe and comfortable. Environmental safety, cleanliness, infection prevention and control practice and medicines management needed improvement.
A shared culture was not embedded within the service. Managerial oversight did not always lead to best outcomes for people. Governance processes did not always identify issues in the home in a timely or consistent manner. Learning opportunities were not always identified or did not always translate into improvements.
Care was not always delivered in line with people’s assessed needs or preferences. There was mixed feedback from healthcare professionals regarding effective communication and care standards.
The registered manager was receptive to our feedback following day 1 and took steps to address these issues. There were noted improvements when we returned on the second day.
We observed a number of positive care interactions. Staff were kind, sensitive and thoughtful towards those they cared for. People were supported to maintain their independence through personal choice and control. The provider had a helpful staff support programme which promoted their wellbeing. There were enough trained and competent staff to meet people’s needs.
People and their families were involved in care and treatment decisions. The service worked with healthcare partners to meet people’s care needs and there was a varied and meaningful activities programme to support social wellbeing and community integration. Staff were confident about raising concerns and the service was keen to do the best for people.
The registered manager demonstrated a commitment to make improvements and learn. However, we were not fully assured about the sustainability of the improvements or best practices being embedded.
The provider was in breach of 2 legal regulations in relation to effective monitoring of safety and outcomes for people, safe environment, infection control processes and medicines management.
-
Safe
No rating
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.
This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.
The service was in breach of the legal regulation in relation to environmental safety, infection control and medicines management.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
Staff supported people with kindness and compassion, and people were involved as partners in their care.
This meant people were treat with dignity and respect but now always in line with their wishes.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good.
This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
No rating
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement.
This meant the management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.
The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to effective monitoring of safety and outcomes for people.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 29 July 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 29 July 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Sarah Coyne
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, People who misuse drugs and alcohol
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)8 inspection reports, latest 5 March 2022. Latest assessment published 29 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Wellburn Care Homes Limited
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 01965619 (opens Companies House)
Wellburn Care Homes Limited runs 14 services in England, 9 of them in the North East. 12 are rated Good or Outstanding and 2 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.
Other services run by Wellburn Care Homes Limited
- G Craghall Residential Home Good. Care home, Newcastle upon Tyne
- G Eighton Lodge Residential Care Home Good. Care home, Gateshead
- G Garden House Good. Care home, Northumberland
- G Glenholme Residential Care Home Good. Care home, Sunderland
Getting help from Northumberland County Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Northumberland County Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 01670 536 400
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Northumberland County Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Wellburn House provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Wellburn House as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Wellburn House have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 35 beds at Wellburn House.
- When was Wellburn House last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Wellburn House was published on 29 July 2026.
- Who runs Wellburn House?
- Wellburn House is run by Wellburn Care Homes Limited. It runs 14 services in England, 9 of them in the North East.
- What is Wellburn House's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 29 July 2026.
Contact
- Phone
- 01661 834522
- Address
- Main Road, Ovingham, Prudhoe, NE42 6DE Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Havendene Residential Home (Good, 0.9 miles away) and Rose Tree House (Good, 1 mile away).
Nearest care homes:
- G Havendene Residential Home Good, 0.9 miles away
- G Rose Tree House Good, 1 mile away
- G Red Brick House Good, 1 mile away
- G New Ridley Road Good, 1.8 miles away
- G Mountview Good, 2.2 miles away