Rated Care Homes

Asher House

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 1 rating

    Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • 295 of 361

    rated care homes in Essex are rated Good, like this one.

Asher House: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 6 beds, Essex

Rated Good in October 2026.

Asher House: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Delamer House Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Brenalwood Care Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Butterfly's Care Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    The Retreat Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. RI
    Blenheim Care Home Requires improvement, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Essex

See all care homes in Walton-on-the-Naze

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 29 October 2026 (assessment visit 7 September 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of assessment: 17 September to 16 October 2026. Asher House provides support to autistic people and those with a learning disability and a range of associated mental health needs. The service has been designed to support people with ongoing complex needs who are stepping down from hospital or to avoid an inappropriate admission to hospital. The maximum number of people who can live at the service is 6. At the time of the inspection the service was supporting 5 people living in their own single self-contained apartments within Asher House. This was the first assessment of the service since it was registered with CQC in May 2022. This was because the service was dormant from February 2023 to January 2025. When a provider is registered but nobody is using either the location or a regulated activity, we refer to it as a dormant service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We have assessed the service against the ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ (RS, RC, RC) guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. The service had been designed in line with RS, RC, RC guidance. It is a small service situated within the local community, made up of individual apartments to allow people to live in their own home, as well as having access to a range of communal facilities within the building to avoid isolation.

Right Culture - The provider had systems in place to assess, monitor and improve the quality of the service to support the safe delivery of care. However, systems to check safety and maintenance of the premises, including fire safety and legionella required further strengthening. Records and risk assessments were not consistently held at the service, making it difficult to demonstrate that identified actions had been completed. The registered manager responded proactively confirming all health and safety records were being transferred to a digital platform to improve accessibility, oversight and ongoing monitoring. The provider valued their workforce demonstrating an exceptional commitment to staff wellbeing, inclusion and professional development resulting in a stable and motivated workforce. Staff felt valued, respected and well supported, which contributed to a positive culture and consistently good outcomes for people.

Right care – People received the right care because their views and opinions had been captured, respected, listened to and implemented as part of their day-to-day support. People had been involved in decisions about their care, including how risks to their safety were managed. This enabled staff to support and empower people to take positive risks, respecting their choices while helping them engage safely in activities that mattered to them. The service employed enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff to meet people's needs. Staffing levels and staff competencies matched the needs of people using the service, including the provision of 1-to-1 and 2-to-1 staff support which helped ensure they received consistent, safe and good-quality care.

Right support - People received care and support from staff that knew them well and understood how to meet their needs safely and supportively. Staff demonstrated a good understanding of people's individual needs and how to support them to achieve positive outcomes and maintain a good quality of life. Staff demonstrated a caring and compassionate approach, taking time to understand what people were experiencing and communicating during periods of anxiety or distress. Positive behaviour support (PBS) plans, developed in conjunction with the PBS team, provided staff with clear guidance to ensure people received consistent and effective support to reduce distress while protecting their rights, dignity and wellbeing. External healthcare professionals were complimentary about how the service worked with them and supported people.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.

    This is the first assessment for this service. This key question has been rated Good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Almas Edwards
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Elysium Healthcare No. 4 LimitedBrand: Elysium Healthcare
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
03257732 (opens Companies House)

Elysium Healthcare No. 4 Limited runs 13 services in England, 1 of them in the East of England. 11 are rated Good or Outstanding, 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 1 has no rating yet.

Other services run by Elysium Healthcare No. 4 Limited

  1. O
    Tottle Brook House Outstanding. Care home with nursing, Nottingham, East Midlands
  2. G
    Avonfield Neurological Centre Good. Care home with nursing, North Northamptonshire, East Midlands
  3. G
    Beech Grove Good. Care home, North Yorkshire, Yorkshire and the Humber
  4. G
    Castleholme Lodge Good. Care home with nursing, Kirklees, Yorkshire and the Humber

See all 13 services run by Elysium Healthcare No. 4 Limited

Getting help from Essex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Asher House provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Asher House as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Asher House have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 6 beds at Asher House.
When was Asher House last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Asher House was published on 29 October 2026.
Who runs Asher House?
Asher House is run by Elysium Healthcare No. 4 Limited. It runs 13 services in England, 1 of them in the East of England.
What is Asher House's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 29 October 2026.

Contact

Phone
01255 444280
Address
Third Avenue, Walton On The Naze, CO14 8JU Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Delamer House Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    Brenalwood Care Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  3. G
    Butterfly's Care Home Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    The Retreat Good, 0.4 miles away
  5. RI
    Blenheim Care Home Requires improvement, 1.1 miles away

See all care homes in Essex

See all care homes in Walton-on-the-Naze