Rated Care Homes

Brenalwood Care Home

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 7 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Good.

  • 11 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 295 of 361

    rated care homes in Essex are rated Good, like this one.

Brenalwood Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 38 beds, Essex

Rated Good in November 2025, up from Inadequate.

Brenalwood Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Butterfly's Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    The Retreat Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Delamer House Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    Asher House Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. RI
    Blenheim Care Home Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away

See all care homes in Essex

See all care homes in Walton-on-the-Naze

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 19 November 2025 (assessment visit 12 August 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Brenalwood Care Home is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care to up to 38 older people, people living with dementia, with a physical disability and/or a sensory impairment. During this assessment 14 people were using the service, most were living with dementia. The service is on a residential street, set over 2 floors. The first floor was not in use during this assessment.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

We visited the service on 16, 18 and 24 September 2025. The inspection visits were undertaken by 2 inspectors, 2 medicine inspectors and an Expert by Experience, who spoke with people using the service and relatives.

Since 2022 the service had been rated either inadequate or requires improvement, with repeated breaches of regulation relating to staffing, safe care and treatment and governance. The provider had failed to respond adequately to serious concerns raised by CQC, and where the provider had made improvements, they had failed to ensure they were embedded in practice and sustained.

At our last assessment published in March 2025, the provider had failed to sustain the improvements made at the previous inspection and was again rated inadequate and remained in breach of regulations relating to safe care and treatment, staffing and governance.

At this assessment we found the provider had worked to make improvements and they were no longer in breach of regulation. Some improvements were ongoing and not yet fully implemented, and we needed to be assured the improvements made were embedded in practice and sustained.

Improvements had been made to the governance systems and overall monitoring of the service, including a new direct and senior management team. At our previous assessment, we were concerned about the stability of the management of the service, and at this assessment, we found a further change had been made. Although the systems for monitoring the service had improved, we identified there were still some areas which required further improvement, such as in people’s care records, risk assessments and medicines which had not been addressed at the time of our assessment.

Improvements had been made to how the service learned lessons from incidents and safeguarding people from abuse. There were now enough staff to support people using the service, which needed to be sustained. However, at the time of the inspection there were only 14 people using the service. We were told by the management team a gradual increase in numbers would be happening to ensure there were enough staff and documentation was in place to support new people moving in.

Improvements had been made to how staff were recruited, and they received regular individual supervision and training. The facilities and equipment met people’s needs, were clean and well-maintained and any risks mitigated.

People and their representatives, as appropriate, were now being consulted about their care and needs and preferences. Staff worked with other professionals to ensure the best outcomes. Staff supported people to maintain good health and to meet their dietary and hydration needs. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. However, daily records did not always show people had consented to care being provided. Staff involved those important to people took decisions in people’s best interests where they did not have capacity.

Staff treated people with kindness and compassion, and protected people’s privacy and dignity. Staff treated people as individuals and supported their preferences. Staff responded to people in a timely way. The provider supported staff wellbeing.

Staff provided information people could understand. There was a complaints procedure in place and people knew how to give feedback. Staff provided people with fair and equal care and treatment. People were involved in planning their care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care.

This service has been in Special Measures since March 2025. The provider demonstrated improvements that have been made. The service is no longer rated as inadequate overall or in any of the key questions. Therefore, this service is no longer in Special Measures.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

    At our last assessment, the service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to safe care and treatment, the ways people’s medicines were managed safely and staffing.At this assessment we have found the provider is no longer in breach of regulation. Improvements made needed to be embedded in practice and sustained. There were some areas which needed further improvement, including medicines and the ways risks were assessed and mitigated, which had not been addressed at the time of our assessment.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s outcomes were good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care. At our last assessment, we found the service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to governance at the service. At this assessment we have found the provider is no longer in breach of regulation. Improvements needed to be embedded in practice and sustained. We identified some issues which had not been addressed at the time of our assessment. We were assured by the management team these improvements were ongoing, and further work was being done.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Kanapathipillai Thirumalthasan
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Sensory Impairment

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

7 inspection reports, latest 2 November 2023. Latest assessment published 19 November 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Regal Care Trading LtdBrand: Nicholas James and Regal Care Trading Limited
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
08126756 (opens Companies House)

Regal Care Trading Ltd runs 15 services in England, 2 of them in the East of England. 9 are rated Good or Outstanding and 6 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Regal Care Trading Ltd

  1. G
    Alpine Care Home Good. Care home, Kent, South East
  2. G
    Ashcroft Nursing Home Good. Care home with nursing, Kent, South East
  3. G
    Blair House Good. Care home, East Sussex, South East
  4. G
    Loose Court Good. Care home, Kent, South East

See all 15 services run by Regal Care Trading Ltd

Getting help from Essex County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Brenalwood Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Brenalwood Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Brenalwood Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 38 beds at Brenalwood Care Home.
When was Brenalwood Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Brenalwood Care Home was published on 19 November 2025.
Who runs Brenalwood Care Home?
Brenalwood Care Home is run by Regal Care Trading Ltd. It runs 15 services in England, 2 of them in the East of England.
What is Brenalwood Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 19 November 2025.

Contact

Phone
01255 675632
Address
Hall Lane, Walton On The Naze, CO14 8HN Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Butterfly's Care Home Good, 0.1 miles away
  2. G
    The Retreat Good, 0.1 miles away
  3. G
    Delamer House Good, 0.2 miles away
  4. G
    Asher House Good, 0.3 miles away
  5. RI
    Blenheim Care Home Requires improvement, 0.8 miles away

See all care homes in Essex

See all care homes in Walton-on-the-Naze