Rated Care Homes

Kensington Hall

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 4 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 9 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 117 of 136

    rated care homes in County Durham are rated Good, like this one.

Kensington Hall: inspection record

Care home, 13 beds, County Durham

Rated Good in January 2026, up from Requires improvement.

Kensington Hall: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Murton Grange Good, 1.3 miles away
  2. G
    Trinity House Good, 1.3 miles away
  3. G
  4. G
    Church View (Murton) Good, 1.4 miles away
  5. G
    Primrose Care Home Good, 2 miles away

See all care homes in County Durham

See all care homes in Murton

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 27 January 2026 (assessment visit 4 November 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 10 November to 26 November 2025. We visited the home on 10 November and 18 November. The service is a residential care home providing support to up to 13 people with a learning disability and autistic people. At the time of our assessment 12 people were living at the service. We undertook this assessment to follow up on previous breaches of regulation and due to the length of time since the last assessment. We found people received safe care and were happy living at Kensington Hall.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

The provider was previously in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance. Improvements were found at this assessment, and the provider was no longer in breach of this regulation. There had been improvement to care and medicines records. The provider demonstrated a commitment to continuous improvement through their governance systems. However, some improvement was still needed as the provider was not consistently notifying CQC of all reportable events in the home. Immediate action was taken to review this, and it did not have any impact on people.

Systems were in place to keep people safe from the risk of abuse and lessons were learnt from events which occurred. At the last inspection we made a recommendation about person centred care. Although some improvement had been made, further work was needed to demonstrate people’s social needs met their goals and consistently achieved positive outcomes. People had holidays and took part in community activities. However, during our assessment we also observed times when there was little meaningful activity being supported.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. The service was not consistently meeting some of the underpinning principles of Right support, right care, right culture. The service is larger than recommended in current best practice guidance and is recognisable as a care home due to external signage. However, care was planned in a person-centred way, and the ethos and delivery of the service followed the principles of the guidance.

Regular safety checks were completed on the environment, utilities and equipment. People received their prescribed medicines at the right time and in the right way. Safe infection prevention and control practices were followed to minimise the spread of infection. People’s care plans were person centred and included best practice guidance on how to effectively support people with a learning disability and autistic people. People were supported to make informed decisions about their care through their involvement in the initial assessment of their needs, care planning and review processes. Staff treated people with kindness and respect and promoted their independence. Staff provided people with the support they needed to maintain good health and wellbeing. The culture of the service was positive. Manager’s led by example.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Joy Kerr
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

8 inspection reports, latest 6 December 2023. Latest assessment published 27 January 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Potensial LimitedBrand: Potensial Limited
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
05846789 (opens Companies House)

Potensial Limited runs 28 services in England, 8 of them in the North East. 27 are rated Good or Outstanding and 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Potensial Limited

  1. O
    Mansard House Outstanding. Care home, Lancashire, North West
  2. G
    16 Crompton Street Good. Care home, Liverpool, North West
  3. G
    185 Watling St Road Good. Care home, Lancashire, North West
  4. G
    44 Newbold Road Good. Care home, Derbyshire, East Midlands

See all 28 services run by Potensial Limited

Getting help from Durham County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Kensington Hall provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Kensington Hall as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Kensington Hall have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 13 beds at Kensington Hall.
When was Kensington Hall last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Kensington Hall was published on 27 January 2026.
Who runs Kensington Hall?
Kensington Hall is run by Potensial Limited. It runs 28 services in England, 8 of them in the North East.
What is Kensington Hall's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 27 January 2026.