Rated Care Homes

Tapton Grove

RI

Requires improvement

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 6 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Inadequate to Requires improvement.

  • 6 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 41 of 219

    rated care homes in Derbyshire are rated Requires improvement, like this one.

Tapton Grove: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 61 beds, Derbyshire

Rated Requires improvement in April 2026, up from Inadequate.

Tapton Grove: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Brimington Care Centre (Good, 0.5 miles away) and St Michaels Nursing Home (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Brimington Care Centre Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
    St Michaels Nursing Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. RI
    Laurel Grove Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
  4. G
    Beechwood House Good, 1 mile away
  5. G
    Cedar Lodge Good, 1 mile away

See all care homes in Derbyshire

See all care homes in Brimington

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 24 April 2026 (assessment visit 13 February 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Inspection: 30 March to 9 April 2026. Tapton Grove is a residential and nursing home providing regulated activity to adults living with dementia and mental health conditions. The service is registered to provide care for up to 61 people. At the time of our inspection, 37 people were using the service. This inspection was carried out to follow up on the actions we had asked the provider to make following our last inspection in July 2025. At this inspection we found 2 continued breaches of regulation in relation to people’s safe care and treatment and the need for consent. Further work was still required to ensure effective oversight of medicine management and the quality and completion of mental capacity assessments. Some issues we identified during this inspection had not been highlighted through the provider’s audit processes, meaning some risks and inconsistencies had not been recognised or addressed. We did identify several improvements made by the provider, including strengthened processes for managing known risks. People’s care plans and risk assessments had been updated, and appropriate control measures were now in place to minimise the likelihood of avoidable harm. We also found improvements to the oversight of environmental risks and a more effective staffing structure in place. We found the provider had strengthened their systems and processes, with effective measures in place to ensure accidents and incidents were properly investigated and analysed. Improvements had also been made to how people’s needs were assessed we found clear, up‑to‑date information was available to staff, providing an overview of people’s assessed needs, and this was reviewed regularly. Shift handovers ensured staff were informed of any changes, and regular meetings were held across the service with the management team. The provider had increased the range of activities available since our last inspection, and the activities timetable had been co‑produced with people using the service and staff. We also found the provider had taken action to address previous concerns relating to people’s independence, choice and understanding of their rights. People told us they felt supported to make decisions about their care, treatment and wellbeing, and this was now more clearly reflected in care documentation. People were supported to plan for significant life changes, giving them time to make informed decisions about their future, including at the end of their life. This service has been in Special Measures since September 2025. The provider demonstrated improvements that have been made. The service is no longer rated as inadequate overall or in any of the key questions. Therefore, this service is no longer in Special Measures. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.

  • Safe No rating
  • Effective No rating
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led No rating
Read the rest of CQC's summary
  1. Safe

    No rating

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating changed to requires improvement. This meant some aspects of the service were not always safe and there was limited assurance about safety. There was an increased risk that people could be harmed.The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to how people’s medicines were managed.

  2. Effective

    No rating

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence.At our last assessment we rated this key question inadequate. At this assessment the rating has changed to requires improvement. This meant the effectiveness of people’s care, treatment and support did not always achieve good outcomes or was inconsistent.The service was in breach of legal regulation in relation to the need for consent.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    No rating

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has remained requires improvement.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Safe was rated Requires improvement on 24 April 2026. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
  2. Effective was rated Requires improvement on 24 April 2026. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
  3. Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 24 April 2026. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
  4. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.

Registration details

Registered manager
Rachel Bradford
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Mental Health

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

6 inspection reports, latest 15 March 2023. Latest assessment published 24 April 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
04220821 (opens Companies House)

Sun Healthcare Limited runs 6 services in England, 2 of them in the East Midlands. 3 are rated Good or Outstanding, 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 2 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Sun Healthcare Limited

  1. G
    Havenfield Lodge Good. Care home with nursing, Barnsley, Yorkshire and the Humber
  2. G
    Shaftsbury House Good. Care home, Barnsley, Yorkshire and the Humber
  3. G
    St Margarets Good. Care home with nursing, North East Lincolnshire, Yorkshire and the Humber
  4. –
    Autism Support and Care No overall rating. Care home, Nottinghamshire

See all 6 services run by Sun Healthcare Limited

Getting help from Derbyshire County Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Tapton Grove provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Tapton Grove as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Tapton Grove have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 61 beds at Tapton Grove.
When was Tapton Grove last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Tapton Grove was published on 24 April 2026.
Who runs Tapton Grove?
Tapton Grove is run by Sun Healthcare Limited. It runs 6 services in England, 2 of them in the East Midlands.
What is Tapton Grove's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 24 April 2026.

Contact

Phone
01246 274178
Address
Grove Road, Brimington, Chesterfield, S43 1QH Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: Brimington Care Centre (Good, 0.5 miles away) and St Michaels Nursing Home (Good, 0.5 miles away).

Nearest care homes:

  1. G
    Brimington Care Centre Good, 0.5 miles away
  2. G
    St Michaels Nursing Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  3. RI
    Laurel Grove Requires improvement, 0.9 miles away
  4. G
    Beechwood House Good, 1 mile away
  5. G
    Cedar Lodge Good, 1 mile away

See all care homes in Derbyshire

See all care homes in Brimington