Rated Care Homes

Cross Street Residential Care Home

Care home, Richmond upon Thames, 4 beds

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

Cross Street Residential Care Home: inspection record

Care home, 4 beds, Richmond upon Thames

Rated Good in March 2026.

Cross Street Residential Care Home: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Inspected and rated 3 times since 2016. Rated Good in 2016, 2019 and March 2026.

It has been rated Good at every inspection since 2016. The latest rating was published 7 months ago.

How it compares locally

  • One of 34 Good care homes in Richmond upon Thames, out of 37 with a rating.
  • Smaller than 9 in 10 care homes in Richmond upon Thames.

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 12 March 2026 (assessment visit 20 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 3 and 10 February 2026.

The service is a care home providing personal care to people with a learning disability and/or autistic people. At the time of our assessment there were 2 people living in the care home.

Read the full summary

The last rating for this service was good (published 26 July 2019). This assessment was planned due to the length of time since our last rating. Following this assessment, the service remains good.

We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

The service had a good learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents thoroughly. People were protected and kept safe. Staff understood and managed risks well. The facilities and equipment met people’s needs and were kept clean and well‑maintained. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Managers made sure staff received training and regular appraisals to maintain good-quality care. Staff managed medicines well.

People participated in assessments and decisions about the care they received. Staff reviewed assessments taking account of people’s communication, personal and health care needs. People had enough to eat and drink to stay healthy. Staff always supported people to live healthier lives and to fully maximise their independence, choice and control. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent.

The service was exceptional at treating people with kindness, empathy and compassion and in how they respected people’s privacy and dignity. Staff protected people’s privacy and dignity. The service promoted the wellbeing of their staff. Staff treated people as individuals and supported their preferences. People were encouraged to maintain relationships with family and friends. Staff responded to people’s needs in a timely way. The service was exceptional at communicating with people and ensuring important information they needed was available in easy to understand and accessible formats. People knew how to give feedback and were confident their view were taken seriously and acted upon. People received fair and equal care and the service worked to reduce health and care inequalities through training and feedback.

Managers and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. They were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. The service strongly valued diversity in their workforce and had an inclusive and fair culture. The service worked well with external health and social care professionals and bodies and always shared information and learning with their partners to deliver the best possible care for people they supported. There was a culture of continuous improvement with staff given time and resources to try new ideas.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  • Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  • Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Contact and registration details

Details for Cross Street Residential Care Home
Address26 Cross Street, Hampton, TW12 1RT
NeighbourhoodHampton, Richmond upon Thames
Phone020 8783 0973
Registered managerMichael Wood
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
  • Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
  • Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder
  • Older People
  • Younger Adults
Inspection reports 2 inspection reports, latest 26 July 2019 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) Latest assessment published 12 March 2026; CQC's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider details for Cross Street Residential Care Home
ProviderSupport for Living LimitedBrand: Certitude
Ownership typeOrganisation
Companies House numberIP27062R (opens Companies House)

Support for Living Limited runs 12 services in London. 10 are rated Good or Outstanding and 2 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.

Other services run by Support for Living Limited

  1. G
    Star Road Respite Service Care home, Hounslow
    Good
  2. G Good
  3. G
    Support for Living Limited - 1 St Quintin Avenue Care home, Kensington and Chelsea
    Good
  4. G Good
  5. G Good
  6. G Good

See all 12 services run by Support for Living Limited

Nearest alternatives

  1. G
    Laurel Dene Care home with nursing, 0.2 miles away
    Good
  2. G Good
  3. G Good
  4. G
    Tudor Avenue Residential Care Home Care home, 0.8 miles away
    Good
  5. G
    St Mary's House Care home, 0.9 miles away
    Good

See all care homes in Richmond upon Thames

Getting help from London Borough of Richmond upon Thames

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Cross Street Residential Care Home provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Cross Street Residential Care Home as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Cross Street Residential Care Home have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 4 beds at Cross Street Residential Care Home.
When was Cross Street Residential Care Home last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Cross Street Residential Care Home was published on 12 March 2026.
Who runs Cross Street Residential Care Home?
Cross Street Residential Care Home is run by Support for Living Limited. It runs 12 services in London.
What is Cross Street Residential Care Home's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 12 March 2026.