Charlton Court Nursing Home
- Care home
- 64 beds
- Nursing care
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2011
- Pudsey, Leeds, Yorkshire and the Humber
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
5 ratings
First rated Requires improvement in 2015, most recently Good in September 2025.
13 months
since the latest rating was published.
104 of 138
rated care homes in Leeds are rated Good, like this one.
Charlton Court Nursing Home: inspection record
Rated Good in September 2025.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- – Gain Lane Farm Apartments Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
- G Whiteoak Good, 0.8 miles away
- G SENSE - 138 Bradford Road Good, 0.8 miles away
- G Farfield Drive Good, 0.8 miles away
- G Claremont Care Home Good, 1.1 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 23 September 2025 (assessment visit 8 July 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
The assessment was carried out on 7 and 13 August 2025. Carlton Court Nursing Home is registered to provide accommodation, personal and nursing care for up to 64 people who may have a physical disability, living with dementia, autistic people, people with a learning disability or people requiring end of life care. At the time of our assessment 54 people lived at the service.
- Safe Good
- Effective Good
- Caring Good
- Responsive Good
- Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
A robust system for investigating and responding to accidents, incidents, complaints, and safeguarding concerns was in place. Potential risks to people had been assessed and reviewed when needed. Staff were fully aware what equipment people needed, and the environment was spacious, clean and pleasant throughout the ground floor, although the first floor was clean and pleasant, the dining area on the first floor consisted of two small rooms that did not allow for a positive dining experience.
Monitoring charts were in place for repositioning, food, and fluids; however, these were not always completed as required. We received mixed feedback re staffing, although staffing levels and people’s needs were met, some staff felt that they did not have enough time to sit and talk with people.
The provider did not always make sure that medicines were stored and disposed of safely. However, the provider did ensure people received their medicines as required by trained and competent staff.
The service demonstrated effective partnership working with external professionals to ensure people’s care was effective. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.
We observed positive interactions between staff and people using the service and staff treated people with dignity and respect.
Care plans were personalised, reflected people’s care needs, and were reviewed with people and their loved ones. Plans with regards to end of life care were in place.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment, and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity, and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment, the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service with nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)8 inspection reports, latest 9 February 2022. Latest assessment published 23 September 2025; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- ADL PlcBrand: Pearl Jackson
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 02463465 (opens Companies House)
ADL Plc runs 11 services in England, 5 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber. 6 are rated Good or Outstanding and 5 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.
Other services run by ADL Plc
- G Castle Park Good. Care home with nursing, Derby, East Midlands
- G Crompton Court Good. Care home, Liverpool, North West
- G Jubilee House Good. Care home with nursing, Torbay, South West
- G Roxburgh House Care Home Good. Care home, Sefton, North West
Getting help from Leeds City Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Leeds City Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0113 222 4401, weekdays 9am to 5pm (Wednesdays from 10am)
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Leeds City Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Charlton Court Nursing Home provide nursing care?
- Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Charlton Court Nursing Home as a care home with nursing.
- How many beds does Charlton Court Nursing Home have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 64 beds at Charlton Court Nursing Home.
- When was Charlton Court Nursing Home last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Charlton Court Nursing Home was published on 23 September 2025.
- Who runs Charlton Court Nursing Home?
- Charlton Court Nursing Home is run by ADL Plc. It runs 11 services in England, 5 of them in Yorkshire and the Humber.
- What is Charlton Court Nursing Home's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 23 September 2025.
Contact
- Phone
- 01274 661242
- Address
- 477-479 Bradford Road, Pudsey, Leeds, LS28 8ED Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- – Gain Lane Farm Apartments Not yet rated, 0.3 miles away
- G Whiteoak Good, 0.8 miles away
- G SENSE - 138 Bradford Road Good, 0.8 miles away
- G Farfield Drive Good, 0.8 miles away
- G Claremont Care Home Good, 1.1 miles away