Victoria Lodge
- Care home
- 9 beds
- No nursing
- Registered since 2016
- Southsea, Portsmouth, South East
Good
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
1 rating
Only one rating on record, so there is no trend to show yet.
8 years
since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.
21 of 29
rated care homes in Portsmouth are rated Good, like this one.
Victoria Lodge: inspection record
Rated Good in October 2018.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
- G Albert Lodge Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- RI Home of Comfort Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
- RI Ormsby Lodge Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
- G Oakland Grange Good, 0.3 miles away
- G Braemar Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 13 October 2018. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
The inspection took place on 13 and 15 August 2018. This inspection was unannounced. Victoria Lodge is a care home providing care for up to nine adults, under the age of 65, with mental health needs. The service is a 'care home'. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection. It is in Portsmouth close to local amenities. Accommodation is provided over two floors. At the time of our visit seven people lived at the home.
Read the rest of CQC's summary
There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are "registered persons". Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
People were supported to maintain good health and involved in decisions about their health. They were provided with personalised care and support. Staff had the knowledge and skills to carry out their roles and their training was updated annually. People were very positive about the care they received.
Risks to people and staff safety were identified, assessed and appropriate action was taken. Staff had completed safeguarding adults training and knew how to keep people safe and report concerns. Staff had a good understanding of systems in place to manage medicines. People's medicines were safely managed. There were thorough recruitment checks completed to help ensure suitable staff were employed to care and support people. There was sufficient staff available to ensure people's wellbeing, safety and security was protected.
The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is required by law to monitor the operation of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and report on what we find. People were supported by staff who had the skills and training to meet their needs. The manager and staff understood their responsibilities in relation to the MCA and DoLS. People were involved in making every day decisions and choices about how they wanted to live their lives and were supported by staff in the least restrictive way possible. People's right to make their own decisions was respected.
Quality assurance procedures were used to monitor and improve the service for people and included them in developing their care and support. Feedback from people and their relatives or supporters was used to improve the service when their views were sought annually. Monitoring and auditing of systems had ensured that an action plan was created and those actions evaluated monthly.
People's independence was promoted and support workers encouraged them to do as much for themselves as possible. Staff treated people with dignity and respect and were sensitive to their needs regarding equality, diversity and their human rights. People were encouraged and enabled to be involved as much as they were able in making decisions about how to meet their needs.
The Equality Act covers the same groups that were protected by existing equality legislation – age, disability, gender reassignment, race, religion or belief, sex, sexual orientation, marriage and civil partnership and pregnancy and maternity. These are now called `protected characteristics. We reviewed one person's care plan which showed their individual religious beliefs and preferences had been considered.
There were regular opportunities for people and staff to feedback any concerns at peoples one to one meetings; house meetings, staff meetings and supervision meetings. Records showed these were open discussions. Feedback was consistently positive, with many complimentary comments about the support provided, the staff and the overall service.
We found that although people's support plans and risk assessments were updated there was no evidence to support this and it was difficult to demonstrate review, however the service was responsive and involved people in developing their support plans which were detailed and personalised to ensure their individual preferences were known. The registered manager acknowledged this and was proactive in developing an evaluation sheet which they have put in place for each person.
People were supported to take part in activities that they enjoyed. Arrangements were in place to obtain the views of people and their relatives and a complaints procedure was available for people and their relatives to use if they had the need.
Staff told us they enjoyed working for the organisation and spoke very positively about the culture and management of the service. They also told us that they were encouraged to openly discuss any issues.
The registered manager had made links with the local college to provide apprenticeships to students to learn about mental health. The registered manager had also forged positive relationships with professionals involved in peoples care and support. Feedback from professionals was very positive.
The registered manager placed great importance on ensuring everybody was treated as an individual. They also ensured the staff team felt valued. The management team ensured that significant events were reported appropriately to the local authority and the CQC when required.
The five questions we ask about services and what we found
Questions to ask when you visit
- The last rating is 8 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
- Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Lauren Anderson
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Mental Health, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)1 inspection report, latest 13 October 2018. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Community Homes of Intensive Care and Education LimitedBrand: Choice Care Group
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 02704854 (opens Companies House)
Community Homes of Intensive Care and Education Limited runs 68 services in England, 48 of them in the South East. 63 are rated Good or Outstanding and 5 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.
Other services run by Community Homes of Intensive Care and Education Limited
- O Argyll House Outstanding. Care home, Swindon, South West
- O Bramerton Outstanding. Care home, Windsor and Maidenhead
- O Fountain View Outstanding. Care home, Hampshire
- O Fritham Lodge Outstanding. Care home, Southampton
See all 68 services run by Community Homes of Intensive Care and Education Limited
Getting help from Portsmouth City Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Portsmouth City Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 023 9268 0810, Monday to Thursday 8.30am to 5pm, Friday 8.30am to 4.30pm
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Portsmouth City Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Victoria Lodge provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Victoria Lodge as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Victoria Lodge have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 9 beds at Victoria Lodge.
- When was Victoria Lodge last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Victoria Lodge was published on 13 October 2018.
- Who runs Victoria Lodge?
- Victoria Lodge is run by Community Homes of Intensive Care and Education Limited. It runs 68 services in England, 48 of them in the South East.
- What is Victoria Lodge's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 13 October 2018.
Contact
- Phone
- 023 9275 4411
- Address
- 19 Victoria Road North, Southsea, PO5 1PL Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
- G Albert Lodge Good, less than 0.1 miles away
- RI Home of Comfort Nursing Home Requires improvement, 0.2 miles away
- RI Ormsby Lodge Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
- G Oakland Grange Good, 0.3 miles away
- G Braemar Care Home Good, 0.5 miles away