Rosenmanor 1
Care home, Lambeth, 9 beds
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
Rosenmanor 1: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in December 2022, down from Good.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Inspected and rated 6 times since 2016. First rated Good in 2016, most recently Requires improvement in December 2022.
Its last inspection moved it down from Good to Requires improvement. The latest rating was published about 4 years ago.
How it compares locally
- One of 8 Requires improvement care homes in Lambeth, out of 33 with a rating.
- About the middle for size in Lambeth.
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 7 December 2022. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Rosenmanor 1 is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care for up to a maximum of 9 people in one adapted building. The service provides support to women with mental health care needs. At the time of our inspection 9 women aged 50 and over were living at the care home.
People's experience of using this service People were not suitably protected from harm because the risks they might face were not always properly assessed and managed. This meant staff did not always have access to enough sufficiently detailed guidance to help them keep people they support safe.
Read the full summary
The provider had established governance and monitoring systems in place however, these were not always operated effectively. This meant the provider had failed to always identify and take appropriate action to prevent people living in the care home being placed at risk of harm. This included staff working excessively long hours without taking sufficient time off to rest and recuperate, staff not always wearing personal protective equipment (PPE), and not always respecting the privacy of people living in the care home.
In addition, records the provider is meant to keep and make available to the CQC on request were not always made immediately accessible on request.
Furthermore, staff were not always adequately supported and supervised by their line managers. This was because staff did not have sufficient opportunities to routinely reflect on their working practices and professional development.
People were kept safe from abuse. The provider ensured there were always sufficient numbers of suitably trained staff to support people and keep them safe. People received personal care and support from staff whose fitness to work in adult social care had been checked. People received their medicines as they were prescribed.
People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.
People were supported to access food and drink that met their dietary needs and wishes. People were supported to stay emotionally and physically healthy and well, and to access relevant community mental health and social care services as and when they needed to.
People were treated equally and had their diversity respected, including their cultural and spiritual needs and wishes. People typically described staff as "kind". People were encouraged and supported to maintain their independent living skills and to do as much for themselves as they were willing and capable of doing safely.
People's care plans were person-centred, which helped staff provide them with the individualised care and support they needed. Staff ensured they communicated and shared information with people in a way they could easily understand. People were encouraged to make decisions about the care and support they received at the care home and staff respected their informed choices. Where appropriate, people's end of life wishes and contacts were known and recorded for staff to refer to.
The registered manager promoted an open culture which sought the views of people, their relatives and staff. The provider worked in close partnership with other health and social care professionals and agencies to plan and deliver people's packages of care.
For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk
Rating at the last inspection The last rating for this service was good (published 26 August 2021).
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 7 December 2022. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Effective was rated Requires improvement on 7 December 2022. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
- Caring was rated Requires improvement on 7 December 2022. Ask how staff protect dignity and how residents are involved in decisions about their care.
- Responsive was rated Requires improvement on 7 December 2022. Ask to see how care plans are kept up to date, how complaints are handled and what activities are on offer.
- The last rating is 4 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
Contact and registration details
| Address | 46 Kempshott Road, London, SW16 5LQ |
|---|---|
| Neighbourhood | Streatham, Lambeth |
| Phone | 020 8764 8915 |
| Registered manager | Parvadee Shumoogam |
| Registered with the CQC since | |
| What it provides |
|
| Who it supports |
|
| Inspection reports | 8 inspection reports, latest 7 December 2022 (opens the Care Quality Commission website) The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website. |
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
| Provider | Rosenmanor LimitedBrand: Rosenmanor Limited |
|---|---|
| Ownership type | Organisation |
| Companies House number | 04433986 (opens Companies House) |
Rosenmanor Limited runs 3 services in London. 0 are rated Good or Outstanding and 3 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate.
Other services run by Rosenmanor Limited
- RI Rosemanor 2 Residential Care Home Care home, CroydonRequires improvement
- RI Rosenmanor Limited Care home, CroydonRequires improvement
Nearest alternatives
- G Vosse Court Care home, 0.1 miles awayGood
- RI Thanet House Care home, 0.2 miles awayRequires improvement
- RI Joybrook Care home, 0.3 miles awayRequires improvement
- G Crownwise Limited - Parkview Care home, 0.3 miles awayGood
- G Crownwise Limited - Streatham Common South Care home, 0.3 miles awayGood
Getting help from London Borough of Lambeth
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at London Borough of Lambeth
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 020 7926 5555, select Adults
- Contact adult social care online
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: London Borough of Lambeth
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Rosenmanor 1 provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Rosenmanor 1 as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Rosenmanor 1 have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 9 beds at Rosenmanor 1.
- When was Rosenmanor 1 last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Rosenmanor 1 was published on 7 December 2022.
- Who runs Rosenmanor 1?
- Rosenmanor 1 is run by Rosenmanor Limited. It runs 3 services in London.
- What is Rosenmanor 1's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 7 December 2022.