Rated Care Homes

Tollemache Road Respite Service

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Rated Good at every inspection since 2018.

  • This month

    The latest rating was published.

  • 72 of 101

    rated care homes in Wirral are rated Good, like this one.

Tollemache Road Respite Service: inspection record

Care home, 10 beds, Wirral

Rated Good in October 2026.

Tollemache Road Respite Service: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Park View Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. RI
    Beechcroft Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Oxton Grange Care Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Windy Knowe Nursing Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. RI
    Nazareth House - Birkenhead Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away

See all care homes in Wirral

See all care homes in Claughton

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 21 October 2026 (assessment visit 5 August 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

About the service

Tollemache Road Respite Service is a care home which operates as a respite service where people stay for short breaks. Up to 10 people can book in and stay at the service at a time. We carried out our assessment over a 2-week period. Each week of the assessment, there were 7 people using the service.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Good
  • Caring Good
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

Who the service is for

This is a specialist respite service for autistic people and people with a learning disability.

Key findings

We carried out this assessment on 7 September, 9 September and 15 September 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

We assessed the provider against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

Staff were recruited safely and staff had the skills and knowledge to support people effectively. This included training to support autistic people and people with a learning disability.

Medicines were administered safely. Risks were assessed before people started to use the service and people were involved in the process. These risks were reviewed before each stay to ensure any changes in care needs were known, and staff understood how to support people effectively, and safely. This included any changes in specialist advice or guidance. A family member told us, “They check [Name’s] needs on a regular basis and adapt what we need. They are fantastic with [Name], [Name] is happy and loves going.” Another family member confirmed, “When I book [Name] in, they ask if anything new I need to make them aware of, they ask me, it’s risk assessed when you register them in.”

When people needed specialist support with their care or to take their medicines, for example because of a specific health condition, staff received specialist training and, where appropriate, observations of practice were completed.

There were effective systems in place to safeguard people from abuse. When incidents or accidents happened, other agencies where informed when appropriate and systems were in place to look at how lessons could be learnt to avoid a reoccurrence. Family members felt confident in how any incidents were managed. One told us, “If anything happened, [Name] would tell us. If I didn’t feel confident in that sense or if I felt a risk, I’d not leave [Name] there.”

The environment and equipment were clean, safe and well maintained. Regular fire drills were conducted to ensure staff and people who were staying at the service knew what to do in the event of an emergency.

People can only be deprived of their liberty to receive care and treatment with appropriate legal authority. In care homes, this can be done through a procedure called the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), which is part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). We checked whether the service was working within the principles of the MCA and how they managed DoLS within the service. We found that staff and management worked within the MCA. Nobody was being deprived of their liberty. People were not subject to unlawful or excessive restrictions, they had choice, control and freedom over their lives. People confirmed staff knocked on their bedroom doors before entering. One family member explained staff have used picture cards with their loved one to gain consent and to support effective decision making.

Care plans highlighted people’s preferences in care. Staff demonstrated a very strong commitment to person-centred support and care. We observed kind and caring interactions between people and staff and people were supported to maintain their independence and usual daily routines and activities. Some people liked to help staff during their stay. One person told us, “I put the cutlery and mats out and sometimes help with other things.”

Processes were in place to ensure people had equity in experience and outcomes during their stay. For example, activities and meals were planned with people at the start of the week to ensure everyone had the opportunity to choose activities and meals which were important to them and enhanced their experience. One person told us they had chosen the cinema and macaroni cheese for their stay. A staff member told us of a recent activity when everyone chose to go out for tea rather than have a cooked meal. People spoke positively about the food provided at the service. Comments included, “The dinners are good” and “I like the food.”

The provider had a clear shared vision and strategy, and staff told us they felt valued and supported. A staff member said, “[The registered manager] is nice. They are good. We would go to them or the deputy manager. If there was a problem, they would sort it.”

A system of audits and checks was in place which was effective to monitor the quality of the service and identify any improvements. There was a culture of learning and improvement. Leaders worked with people, their families, other professionals and staff to continually strive to improve the service.

Visiting professionals gave positive feedback about the service and positive partnership working. Comments included, “I value the way their staff take the time to understand my clients’ complex needs and ensure [Name] is happy and settled throughout their stay” and “On several occasions, I have had to connect with the service to provide emergency respite for individuals experiencing difficulties in their usual place of residence. Tollemache have always provided a calm and professional approach to these scenarios, assessing thoroughly and ensuring that even in a crisis, the individual receives a person-centred experience.”

Staff were also responsive to peoples changes in circumstance. During our assessment a person stayed longer than planned due to a personal circumstance occurring. A family member told us of another time when their loved on stayed on longer than planned due to a family emergency. They spoke of the relief that gave them and said, “That to us was out of this world, fantastic.”

There was a strong sense of teamwork between staff who spoke with pride about working at Tollemache Road Respite Service. One staff member said, “We are a good team and we get on well.”

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Good

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.

  3. Caring

    Good

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained a good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question as good. At this assessment the rating has remained as good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  2. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Nicola Larkin
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service without nursing
Who it supports
Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 19 June 2021. Latest assessment published 21 October 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Sanctuary Home Care LimitedBrand: Sanctuary Care Limited
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
IP28232R (opens Companies House)

Sanctuary Home Care Limited runs 23 services in England, 2 of them in the North West. 20 are rated Good or Outstanding, 1 is rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 2 have no rating yet.

Other services run by Sanctuary Home Care Limited

  1. O
    Corner House Residential Care Home Outstanding. Care home, Nottinghamshire, East Midlands
  2. O
    Hilltop House (Domiciliary Care) Outstanding. Home care, Suffolk, East of England
  3. O
    Montague Road Care Home Outstanding. Care home, Suffolk, East of England
  4. O
    Sanctuary Supported Living - 26 Tilmore Gardens Outstanding. Care home, Hampshire, South East

See all 23 services run by Sanctuary Home Care Limited

Getting help from Wirral Borough Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Tollemache Road Respite Service provide nursing care?
No. The Care Quality Commission lists Tollemache Road Respite Service as a care home without nursing.
How many beds does Tollemache Road Respite Service have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 10 beds at Tollemache Road Respite Service.
When was Tollemache Road Respite Service last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Tollemache Road Respite Service was published on 21 October 2026.
Who runs Tollemache Road Respite Service?
Tollemache Road Respite Service is run by Sanctuary Home Care Limited. It runs 23 services in England, 2 of them in the North West.
What is Tollemache Road Respite Service's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 21 October 2026.

Contact

Phone
01905 334000
Address
31-33 Tollemache Road, Prenton, CH43 8SU Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    Park View Good, 0.4 miles away
  2. RI
    Beechcroft Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  3. G
    Oxton Grange Care Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. G
    Windy Knowe Nursing Home Good, 0.5 miles away
  5. RI
    Nazareth House - Birkenhead Requires improvement, 0.5 miles away

See all care homes in Wirral

See all care homes in Claughton