Rated Care Homes

Heartlands

G

Good

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 2 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Requires improvement to Good.

  • 3 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • 184 of 245

    rated care homes in Birmingham are rated Good, like this one.

Heartlands: inspection record

Care home with nursing, 66 beds, Birmingham

Rated Good in July 2026, up from Requires improvement.

Heartlands: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Abbey Court Care Ltd Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
  3. G
    Yardley Grange Nursing Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. RI
    Estervin Court Residential Care Home Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  5. –
    Lea Hall Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away

See all care homes in Birmingham

See all care homes in Garretts Green

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 7 July 2026 (assessment visit 15 May 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of inspection: 09 June 2026 to 23 June 2026. Heartlands is a care home providing personal and nursing care for people aged 65 and over, some of whom are living with dementia. At the time of this inspection, 63 people were living at the service. The accommodation is arranged over three floors, each with its own communal areas.
This was a follow-up inspection carried out in response to previous concerns. The inspection focused on the key questions Safe and Well-led where breaches of legal regulations had previously been identified. This included concerns around medicines management, the safety and maintenance of the environment, and ineffective governance systems which had failed to identify and address risks.
At this inspection, we found that sufficient improvements had been made and sustained, and the provider is no longer in breach of these regulations. Medicines management had improved, with appropriate systems in place to ensure medicines were administered and recorded safely, including those that are time-specific and covert (Covert medicines are medicines given to a person without their knowledge, usually by disguising them in food or drink) This should only be carried out in a person’s best interests and in line with legal requirements . The maintenance and safety of the environment had improved, and risks were more effectively identified and mitigated.
Governance systems had been strengthened and were more effective in identifying concerns and driving improvements. Audits and quality checks were more robust, and where issues had been identified, appropriate action had been taken to address these. For example, following a recent serious incident, the provider introduced additional measures including revised documentation, new checklists, enhanced training, and managerial sign-off processes.
Training had been enhanced through more targeted, face-to-face and scenario-based sessions, with a focus on practical application and learning from incidents. This included the introduction of International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI) training, ensuring staff had a clear understanding of safe food and fluid preparation and consistency levels. As part of the IDDSI training care plan profiles were developed for people, providing clear, individualised guidance to staff. Staff also received refresher training in dietary needs alongside increased competency assessments and management oversight to ensure learning was understood and embedded into practice. Clearer expectations and sign-off processes were introduced to confirm staff competence.
These improvements had been implemented not only within the service but also across the provider’s other services to support shared learning and help prevent similar incidents from reoccurring. Overall, changes had been embedded into day-to-day practice and were being consistently sustained.
There were sufficient staff to keep people safe, and staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Staff were supported through training and ongoing development and demonstrated improved practice in monitoring people’s health and wellbeing, including areas such as repositioning, nutrition, and hydration.
We observed positive and caring interactions between staff and people. Staff spoke with people in a kind and respectful way and supported their dignity. People and their relatives were involved in care planning and kept informed of any changes in needs. Care plans provided clear guidance to staff, including how to support people who may experience distress, to ensure appropriate and consistent responses.
There were effective processes in place to support communication with healthcare professionals, and their advice was incorporated into care delivery. People had access to activities which supported their emotional and social wellbeing.
The management team demonstrated a clear commitment to improvement. They were responsive during the inspection and had taken appropriate action to address previous concerns. Overall, the provider has made significant improvements, and previous breaches relating to safe care and treatment and good governance have been addressed. The service was no longer in breach of these regulations.

  • Safe Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary
  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement.
    At this assessment the rating has changed to good
    This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
    The service was no longer in breach of legal regulation in relation to safe care and treatment. Which meant concerns relating to the safety of the care environment and the way people’s medicines were managed had improved.

  2. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led– this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture.
    At our last assessment we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good.
    This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
    The service was no longer in breach of legal regulation in relation to the management of safety and governance at the service. Which meant concerns relating to the management of safety and governance had improved.

Questions to ask when you visit

  1. Ask how nursing cover works at night and at weekends.
  2. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the home did about any points in it.
  3. Visit at different times of day, including a mealtime.

Registration details

Registered manager
Joanne Cox
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Care home service with nursing
Who it supports
Dementia, Older People

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

1 inspection report, latest 19 September 2019. Latest assessment published 7 July 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Country Court Care Homes 2 LimitedBrand: Country Court Care
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
09020971 (opens Companies House)

Country Court Care Homes 2 Limited runs 19 services in England, 1 of them in the West Midlands. 15 are rated Good or Outstanding, 3 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 1 has no rating yet.

Other services run by Country Court Care Homes 2 Limited

  1. G
    Birkin Lodge Good. Care home with nursing, Kent, South East
  2. G
    Camberwell Lodge Good. Care home with nursing, Southwark, London
  3. G
    Carter House Good. Care home with nursing, Merton, London
  4. G
    Fenchurch House Good. Care home, Lincolnshire, East Midlands

See all 19 services run by Country Court Care Homes 2 Limited

Getting help from Birmingham City Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Heartlands provide nursing care?
Yes. The Care Quality Commission lists Heartlands as a care home with nursing.
How many beds does Heartlands have?
The Care Quality Commission's register lists 66 beds at Heartlands.
When was Heartlands last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Heartlands was published on 7 July 2026.
Who runs Heartlands?
Heartlands is run by Country Court Care Homes 2 Limited. It runs 19 services in England, 1 of them in the West Midlands.
What is Heartlands's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Good, published on 7 July 2026.

Contact

Address
50 Broadstone Road, Yardley, Birmingham, B26 2BN Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. RI
    Abbey Court Care Ltd Requires improvement, 0.3 miles away
  2. G
  3. G
    Yardley Grange Nursing Home Good, 0.4 miles away
  4. RI
    Estervin Court Residential Care Home Requires improvement, 0.4 miles away
  5. –
    Lea Hall Not yet rated, 0.4 miles away

See all care homes in Birmingham

See all care homes in Garretts Green