Diamond House
- Care home
- 74 beds
- No nursing
- Dementia care
- Registered since 2020
- Beaumont Leys, Leicester, East Midlands
Requires improvement
Rated on
Rating from the Care Quality Commission.
At a glance
5 ratings
First rated Good in 2015, most recently Requires improvement in May 2023.
3 years
since the latest rating was published. A rating this old may not show how the service is today.
18 of 90
rated care homes in Leicester are rated Requires improvement, like this one.
Diamond House: inspection record
Rated Requires improvement in May 2023.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: George Hythe House (Good, 0.5 miles away) and Halifax Drive (Good, 0.6 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G George Hythe House Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Halifax Drive Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Bradley Hall Good, 0.8 miles away
- G Damascus House Good, 0.8 miles away
- G Orchard Manor View Good, 1 mile away
About the service
From the Care Quality Commission's inspection report published 11 May 2023. Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Diamond House is a residential care home providing the regulated activity accommodation and personal care. The care home accommodates 74 people across two separate buildings, each of which has separate adapted facilities. The service provides support to people with a physical disability and/or people living with dementia. At the time of our inspection, there were 64 people using the service.
What inspectors found
The systems and processes that assessed and monitored quality and risks had been improved upon but were not sufficiently robust in some areas.
Read the rest of CQC's summary
Improvements to the cleanliness and hygiene in some parts of the service was required. Immediate actions were taken to make these improvements.
People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. However, improvements were required in how MCA assessments and best interest decisions were documented.
Staff deployment in 1 building was not consistently adequate, to meet people's needs and safety. Immediate action was taken to improve staffing.
Staff training had improved, but gaps were still evident in some areas. Staff were recruited safely and received opportunities to review their work, training, and development needs.
Care documents used to provide staff with detailed guidance of how to meet people's known risks and individual care needs, were being reviewed and updated. Where completed, guidance was detailed and reflected people's needs and preferred routines.
Risks associated with fire safety had improved and were being monitored. Staff were aware of their responsibilities to protect people from abuse and avoidable harm.
People were positive about the choice and quality of food and drinks. People's individual dietary needs were known, understood, and monitored.
People's health needs were monitored, and staff worked with external health care professionals, in supporting people to achieve positive outcomes.
People received care that was respectful, compassionate, and dignified. Choice and independence were promoted. People were positive about the caring approach of staff, whom they believed knew and
understood their needs well.
People received opportunities to participate in group and individual activities based on their interests and hobbies. A new document to reflect people's end of life care wishes had been introduced. People's diverse and cultural needs and preferences were recorded and understood by staff. People's individual communication needs had been assessed.
People, visitors, and staff received opportunities to share their experience to help develop the service. Staff were positive about working at the service and improvements had been made to the frequency of staff meetings and communication. Staff competency checks had been introduced and were an effective way to measure staff skills and learning needs.
The registered manager and provider understood their registration regulatory responsibilities. The last rating for the service was clearly displayed.
Questions to ask when you visit
- Safe was rated Requires improvement on 11 May 2023. Ask how medicines are managed, how staffing levels are decided and how incidents are reviewed.
- Effective was rated Requires improvement on 11 May 2023. Ask about staff training and how health appointments are arranged.
- Well-led was rated Requires improvement on 11 May 2023. Ask about changes in management and what has changed since the report.
- The last rating is 3 years old. Ask what has changed since then.
Registration details
- Registered manager
- Julie Wilkinson
- Registered with the CQC since
- What it provides
- Care home service without nursing
- Who it supports
- Dementia, Older People, Physical Disability, Younger Adults
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)2 inspection reports, latest 11 May 2023. The reports are on the Care Quality Commission website.
The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
- Provider
- Minster Care Management LimitedBrand: Minster Care Group
- Ownership type
- Organisation
- Companies House number
- 03676785 (opens Companies House)
Minster Care Management Limited runs 27 services in England, 6 of them in the East Midlands. 18 are rated Good or Outstanding, 7 are rated Requires improvement or Inadequate and 2 have no rating yet.
Other services run by Minster Care Management Limited
- G Abbeywell Court Good. Care home with nursing, Staffordshire, West Midlands
- G Broadgate Care Home Good. Care home with nursing, Nottinghamshire
- G Chestnut Lodge Good. Care home with nursing, Ealing, London
- G Elm Lodge Good. Care home with nursing, Ealing, London
Getting help from Leicester City Council
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Leicester City Council
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 0116 454 1004, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Leicester City Council
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Diamond House provide nursing care?
- No. The Care Quality Commission lists Diamond House as a care home without nursing.
- How many beds does Diamond House have?
- The Care Quality Commission's register lists 74 beds at Diamond House.
- When was Diamond House last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Diamond House was published on 11 May 2023.
- Who runs Diamond House?
- Diamond House is run by Minster Care Management Limited. It runs 27 services in England, 6 of them in the East Midlands.
- What is Diamond House's CQC rating?
- Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Requires improvement, published on 11 May 2023.
Contact
- Address
- 80 Bewcastle Grove, Leicester, LE4 2JW Map (opens Google Maps)
Compare nearby
Nearest rated Good or Outstanding: George Hythe House (Good, 0.5 miles away) and Halifax Drive (Good, 0.6 miles away).
Nearest care homes:
- G George Hythe House Good, 0.5 miles away
- G Halifax Drive Good, 0.6 miles away
- G Bradley Hall Good, 0.8 miles away
- G Damascus House Good, 0.8 miles away
- G Orchard Manor View Good, 1 mile away