Park House
Home care, Kingston upon Thames
No overall rating
No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.
Park House: inspection record
This service has no overall rating at present. The squares show its earlier ratings.
| 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | ||||||||||||
| Safe | ||||||||||||
| Effective | ||||||||||||
| Caring | ||||||||||||
| Responsive | ||||||||||||
| Well-led |
Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.
Rated Good in January 2026.
The latest rating was published 9 months ago.
What inspectors found
From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 26 January 2026 (assessment visit 29 December 2025). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.
Dates of assessment:13 to 19 January 2026.
Park House is a homecare agency. They provide personal care support to people in their own homes. This includes supported living settings. This report specifically looks at the personal care provided to people at the supported living settings. At the time of our assessment 2 people were receiving support with personal care.
Read the full summary
A separate report can be found on our website relating to the domiciliary personal care support provided to people in their own homes.
We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.
People were protected and kept safe. Staff understood and managed risks. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received training and regular appraisals to maintain high-quality care.
People were involved in assessments of their needs. Staff reviewed assessments taking account of people’s communication, personal and health needs. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving services. They monitored people’s health to support healthy living. Staff understood and worked within the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. However, there were inconsistencies in the information provided in people’s care records about their capacity to make decisions. The registered manager assured us this information would be reviewed and included.
People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity. They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences.
People were involved in decisions about their care. Staff provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the provider took it seriously and acted on it. Staff supported people’s individual needs, including in relation to their religion and cultural. However, in some care records there could be more information about how to support with people’s cultural needs.
Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Managers provided hands on care and knew the people using their service well. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Managers regularly reviewed the quality and safety of care delivery through a programme of regular spot checks.
-
Safe
Good
Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.
-
Effective
Good
Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently good, and people’s feedback confirmed this.
-
Caring
Good
Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people were supported and treated with dignity and respect; and involved as partners in their care.
-
Responsive
Good
Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.
-
Well-led
Good
Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
Ratings by service
The Care Quality Commission rates each kind of service at this location separately.
| Service | Rating | Date | Safe | Effective | Caring | Responsive | Well-led |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homecare | Good | Safe: Good | Effective: Good | Caring: Good | Responsive: Good | Well-led: Good | |
| Supported Living | Good | Safe: Good | Effective: Good | Caring: Good | Responsive: Good | Well-led: Good |
Questions to ask the service
- Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
- Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.
Contact and registration details
| Address | 1-3, Park Terrace, Worcester Park, KT4 7JZ |
|---|---|
| Registered manager | Matilda Anyango |
| Registered with the CQC since | |
| What it provides |
|
| Who it supports |
|
Inspection report
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.
Who runs it
| Provider | Reon Care Ltd |
|---|---|
| Ownership type | Organisation |
| Companies House number | 14104014 (opens Companies House) |
Nearest alternatives
- G Expert Care Solutions – Worcester Park Home care, less than 0.1 miles awayGood
- G Blossom Home Care London Borough of Sutton Home care, 0.4 miles awayGood
- O Trinity Homecare Home care, 0.4 miles awayOutstanding
- O Trinity Homecare (Worcester Park) Home care, 0.4 miles awayOutstanding
- – St Ann's Lodge 2 Care home, 0.6 miles awayNo overall rating
Getting help from Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames
The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.
- Adult social care at Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames
- Ask for a care needs assessment
- Phone: 020 8547 5005. Email adults@kingston.gov.uk
- Support for carers
- Paying for care: Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames
Checked on the council's website, November 2026.
Common questions
- Does Park House provide nursing care?
- The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Park House.
- When was Park House last inspected?
- The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Park House was published on 26 January 2026.
- Who runs Park House?
- Park House is run by Reon Care Ltd.
- What is Park House's CQC rating?
- No overall rating: this location offers more than one kind of service, so the CQC rates each service separately.