Rated Care Homes

Outreach Services

O

Outstanding

Rated on

Rating from the Care Quality Commission.

At a glance

  • 3 ratings

    Its last inspection improved it from Good to Outstanding.

  • 6 months

    since the latest rating was published.

  • The only one

    rated Outstanding home care service in Sefton, out of 36 with a rating.

Outreach Services: inspection record

Home care, Sefton

Rated Outstanding in April 2026, up from Good.

Outreach Services: inspection record: inspection ratings by year, 2015 to 2026
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Overall
Safe
Effective
Caring
Responsive
Well-led

Ratings published by the Care Quality Commission.

Compare nearby

  1. G
    ICare (GB) Limited - Sefton Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Aspirations Northwest Adults No overall rating, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Manna House Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Liver Care Ltd Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Glenelg Support Limited Good, 1.2 miles away

See all home care services in Sefton

See all home care services in Netherton

What inspectors found

From the Care Quality Commission's assessment published 13 April 2026 (assessment visit 7 January 2026). Quoted under the Open Government Licence.

Date of Assessment: 15 January to 10 February 2025. The service is a care at home (supported living) service providing support to adults of all ages) living with a learning disability and/or autism. At the time of our inspection there were over 200 people using the service who lived across a large geographical area in the Northwest of England. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. Many of the people who received support lived in 'supported living' settings. People held an individual tenancy for their own property or lived in shared accommodation where they held a tenancy for their bedroom; and shared communal areas such as lounges and kitchens. Each 'supported living' service had designated space for staff to store their belongings, maintain records and when needed, provide sleeping in support. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. This provider was able to demonstrate how they were meeting the underpinning principles of ‘Right support, right care, right culture’.

  • Safe Good
  • Effective Outstanding
  • Caring Outstanding
  • Responsive Good
  • Well-led Good
Read the rest of CQC's summary

People using the service were at the heart of their own care and support. There was a strong person-centred culture, people were empowered to make choices and decisions regarding every aspect of their lives. A positive ‘can do’ and person-centred approach was taken to the management of risks. People were not simply told they could not do something because it was too risky, genuine consideration was given to people’s aspirations, freedom and choice. Staff went above and beyond to ‘make it happen’ for people. People consistently achieved outcomes that went beyond expectations, such as maintaining an independent life of their choosing and carrying out activities and roles within the community previously thought of as not possible to achieve. People had tailored support plans which focused on their individual needs, preferences, goals and the promotion of their independence. Evidence-based practice was embedded throughout, supported by electronic systems and multidisciplinary collaboration. Staff responded promptly and adapted to changes in people’s care and support, ensuring people’s preferences and needs were met. The provider worked alongside external health and social care professionals to ensure people had access to the care and support they required as and when they needed it. People were supported by core staff teams who knew their needs well. Staff were skilled in Positive Behaviour Support (PBS). The service exceled in treating people with utmost dignity, compassion, and respect. Staff were both committed and passionate in making people feel valued and empowered. Care was highly personalised and promoted independence and emotional wellbeing. Staff were recruited safely, trained and competent for their role. Staff rotas and numbers were adapted as and when necessary to meet the specific needs of people, so there were no restrictions as to when people chose to partake in activities. Both leaders and staff worked collaboratively in ensuring a sense of equality and inclusion across the service. Leaders created and fostered a culture of transparency, and a dedication to continuous improvement. Governance systems were robust and quality improvement plans were utilised to maintain high standards. The provider was not afraid to challenge negative perceptions of care through active community engagement and educational initiatives. The provider was a strong ambassador and champion for the right that people, despite their perceived limitations, should be able to live an independent life of their choosing.

  1. Safe

    Good

    Safe – this means we looked for evidence that people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. At our last assessment we rated this key question good.

    At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people were safe and protected from avoidable harm.

  2. Effective

    Outstanding

    Effective – this means we looked for evidence that people’s care, treatment and support achieved good outcomes and promoted a good quality of life, based on best available evidence. At our last assessment we rated this key question good.

    At this inspection the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant people’s outcomes were consistently better than expected compared to similar services. People’s feedback described it as exceptional and distinctive.

  3. Caring

    Outstanding

    Caring – this means we looked for evidence that the provider involved people and treated them with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

    At our last assessment we rated this key question good. At this assessment the rating has changed to outstanding. This meant people were truly respected and valued as individuals; and empowered as partners in their care in an exceptional service.

  4. Responsive

    Good

    Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the provider met people’s needs. At our last assessment we rated this key question good.

    At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

  5. Well-led

    Good

    Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. At our last assessment we rated this key question good.

    At this assessment the rating has remained good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.

Questions to ask the service

  1. Ask to see the most recent Care Quality Commission (CQC) report and what the service did about any points in it.
  2. Ask how visit times are agreed and who covers when your usual carer is away.

Registration details

Registered manager
Barbara Barker
Registered with the CQC since
What it provides
Domiciliary care service
Who it supports
Children 0-18 years, Learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder, Mental Health, Older People, Younger Adults

Inspection report

Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

2 inspection reports, latest 7 July 2023. Latest assessment published 13 April 2026; the Care Quality Commission's newer assessments are published on its website rather than as reports.

The rating is the Care Quality Commission's. We show it as published and do not change it.

Who runs it

Provider
Autism Initiatives (UK)Brand: Autism Initiatives UK
Ownership type
Organisation
Companies House number
02436777 (opens Companies House)
Charity number
702632

Autism Initiatives (UK) runs 12 services in England, 11 of them in the North West. 12 are rated Good or Outstanding.

Other services run by Autism Initiatives (UK)

  1. O
    Minshull House Outstanding. Care home, Liverpool
  2. G
    Ashdown Close - Southport Good. Care home, Sefton
  3. G
    Cambridge Road Good. Care home, Sefton
  4. G
    Cumberland Gate Good. Care home, Sefton

See all 12 services run by Autism Initiatives (UK)

Getting help from Sefton Council

The council can assess what care someone needs and tell them what help with the cost they may get.

Checked on the council's website, November 2026.

Common questions

Does Outreach Services provide nursing care?
The Care Quality Commission's register does not list nursing care for Outreach Services.
When was Outreach Services last inspected?
The Care Quality Commission's latest rating for Outreach Services was published on 13 April 2026.
Who runs Outreach Services?
Outreach Services is run by Autism Initiatives (UK). It runs 12 services in England, 11 of them in the North West.
What is Outreach Services's CQC rating?
Its overall rating from the Care Quality Commission is Outstanding, published on 13 April 2026.

Contact

Address
Sefton House, Bridle Road, Bootle, L30 4XR Map (opens Google Maps)
Read the full inspection report (opens the Care Quality Commission website)

Compare nearby

  1. G
    ICare (GB) Limited - Sefton Good, less than 0.1 miles away
  2. –
    Aspirations Northwest Adults No overall rating, 0.2 miles away
  3. G
    Manna House Good, 0.3 miles away
  4. G
    Liver Care Ltd Good, 0.7 miles away
  5. G
    Glenelg Support Limited Good, 1.2 miles away

See all home care services in Sefton

See all home care services in Netherton